Here is a hypothetical. Let's say Judge Roy did do something with the 14 year old girl. I don't necessarily doubt it. The question is if he knew she was 14. If he did, it is really bad, and illegal.What question? Your hypothetical that she "may" have looked 15?
geezus...
Here is a hypothetical. Let's say Judge Roy did do something with the 14 year old girl. I don't necessarily doubt it. The question is if he knew she was 14. If he did, it is really bad, and illegal.
If she looked 16, said she was 16, and was willing, it just looks creepy, but not illegal. He can't admit to that either, or he's finished. It's not for me to judge.
I said "you can tell by looking at him." If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.......
Color me shocked!! You can tell by looking at that little freak that he is a perv.
He has you all to beat on Judge Roy. He doesn't need to pile on.[twitter]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/931357870024687616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2017%2F11%2F15%2Fpolitics%2Ftrump-tweeted-yet-roy-moore%2Findex.html[/twitter]
Says the guy who grabs them by the pvssy.
By the way, not a word from trump over Moore's penchant for eighth graders.
What question? Your hypothetical that she "may" have looked 15?
geezus...
We don't need IDs to prove any qualification for voting because it's discriminatory, but somehow an exact age is necessary for dating, and looking older than that age isn't proof enough? So what kind of ID should be necessary for dating, and who sets the age limits - is it different if the "girl" is a confused boy? If any mix of genders (accepting that there aren't just two anymore) is acceptable for dating, marriage, or restrooms, then why precisely is age discrimination acceptable? Talk about mental gymnastics.
Anyone EVER seen a non-legal defense on a pedo done with so much fervor and conviction as 72 is displaying?
How honorable of you.
If sex conversion is an acceptable practice - and more so if it's acceptable at any age since it reflects the desire to be different, then why should age have any factor between consenting "adults". Or are you clowns agreeing that a non adult should be able to permanently mutilate his or her body while being too immature for other things?
Just setting the record straight for Judge Roy. It makes a difference since 16 year olds are legal in Alabama. I'm pretty sure he likes 'em young in any case.That's a distinction that only a child molester would make.
Imma start calling you Chester.
wtf?
I think you're in the wrong thread, the transgender support thread is over there.