New wordmark...

[Crazy Ivan]

I can live with it. Understand the pattern with the second n and e. Now if the State will hire Nike to redo that gawd awful new state emblem.

I don't know who thought that new emblem looked good, but they blew it. And blew a lot of money on it.

 

[VolForLife83]

I know it's showing the state, but it's kind of cheap, generic, and blah

 

[VolForLife83]

It's actually really awful. Really

 

[Wylo]

It's actually really awful. Really

This. It looks like the font maker slipped and spit out a regular N and then went back to the intended settings.

 

[VFL10]

Looks awesome. Love how they incorporated the state outline.

 

[Voltopia]

I do not like this treatment at all. The letters feel squirmy to me when I glance at this, as if they're slanted but not in a way that makes me feel confidence in the name. If this were a real concept, I'd rather they work on finding a different way to work in things. I want the name to feel imposing, to feel dominant, to feel *big*. These don't feel big. Just sort of cutesy.

 

[VolForLife83]

It's just sloppy looking. Heck, people complain our orange don't match. Now we have letters that don't match. I can't believe it passed. It's more like an incomplete idea

 

[Orange And Garnet]

I don't mind it one bit.

 

[bigorange]

The bottom of the first S isn't slanted either, so I'm sure both letters were intended that way for whatever reason. Meh.

 

[LA Vol]

Has this definitely been approved by UT? Surely not.

 

[bigorange]

Has this definitely been approved by UT? Surely not.

Looks like it.

 

[Orange And Garnet]

A year ago: "I can't wait for Nike!!"
Now: "Nike sucks!"
-volnation at its best

 

[BigOrange15]

Has this definitely been approved by UT? Surely not.

Its pretty standard Nike. It looks fine.

 

[LA Vol]

A year ago: "I can't wait for Nike!!"
Now: "Nike sucks!"
-volnation at its best

Nike doesn't suck. This wordmark does. Big difference.

 

[f77f00]

I don't like it at all.

 

[Orange And Garnet]

Nike doesn't suck. This wordmark does. Big difference.

I didn't say they do but people are and will.
Nike isn't going to keep everything the same

 

[ALLVOL24/7/365]

To old I guess but I do not like it. There was no need to change the old logo for some "wordmark" BS. I like the state logo in the T but the rest of it looks like some young kid drew it on the front of a school notebook during English class while ignoring the teacher.

 

[BigOrange15]

To old I guess but I do not like it. There was no need to change the old logo for some "wordmark" BS. I like the state logo in the T but the rest of it looks like some young kid drew it on the front of a school notebook during English class while ignoring the teacher.

The old logo?

 

[Yater]

Looks like it.

Once again. This full version we are seeing is something a guy mocked up based on what HE THOUGHT the full thing would look like. He literally tweeted saying "this is what I think it will look like based on the photos"

We have no idea what it will really look like past the 3.5 letters that are visible on the court.

 

[ShowMeVol]

Nike doesn't suck. This wordmark does. Big difference.

If Nike is responsible for the word mark, Nike sucks.

 

[flatiron]

Not to mention the impact the new font will have on cruitin'.

If there's one thing teens love, it's fonts.

 

[pismonque]

If there's one thing teens love, it's fonts.

Especially if they're Nike fonts. In black.

 

[Crew]

Don't overthink it.

If we win, you will love it.

 

[VolDango]

Looks great. Much more modern. The 2nd N doesn't need to be altered because there is no letter intruding into its space like the 1st N. Pretty plain to see.

 

[vollygirl]

I kinda dig it. There's nothing wrong with something new. It's tasteful. And I like it.