NighthawkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 14,891
- Likes
- 52,913
You’re not even attaching the correct evidence to your argument.I used the NFL because NIL has been exploding so much recently that its made deals made just a few years ago look out of date. Why do you think Nico left us? Because he saw how much other QBs were getting paid this offseason and thought his old contract with us was outdated. What he forgot was he wasn't good enough to demand a pay raise.
Right now the going rate for an elite QB is north of $3 million a year. That's what Bryce Underwood is getting as a true freshman. As the numbers keep going up the demand for a return on investment will get more urgent. What we saw with Nico was the first real big NIL deal and teams didnt know how to handle it. So they moved like they did historically in college football.
As the numbers keep going up they will start to operate more and more like the NFL. With guys like Bryce Underwood who are getting paid top dollar as true freshman being expected to play immediately like 1st round NFL picks. Whether you like it or not college is becoming more and more like the NFL.
The days of stacking positions and going with experience are over. You're gonna see teams being built like we are right now. Lots of young guys being depth. That's the equivalent of undrafted free agents that make up the bulk of NFL rosters. A few upperclassmen and highly regarded freshman being the top line starters. They will get most of the NIL money and thus will be counted on to play. The days of five star freshman sitting are over now that they're getting paid starter money. Look no further than David Sanders.
If Brandon is going to transfer out because he doesn’t start as a freshman, then Nico transferring out IN SPITE OF THE FACT HE STARTED, but wanted more NIL is not a fact in your favor. It’s not analogous. The fact is, Nico sat as a freshman after getting a record NIL deal, which is evidence against your argument.
Either your argument is that Brandon will transfer due to lack of immediate PT (and if that’s your argument, then there is plenty of evidence to the contrary that shows 5*s are willing to sit), OR your argument is that Brandon will transfer due to perceived lack of NIL like Nico did (and if that’s your argument, you need to show what Brandon will be making at UT and why that will be unsatisfactory). But you can’t conflate the evidence for one argument while asserting another argument and expect anyone to think you’re making a valid point. You’re not.
And the David Sanders case is actually evidence in favor of my position…he’s starting Day 1 because who the hell else was going to. Day 1 starting freshmen start because their is a void.
Again, both QBs will be given a shot next year. The best one will start. That might be GMac, that might be Faizon. But Josh Heupel isn’t going to start a QB who was outperformed preseason because he makes more NIL. The suggestion is laughable.