NBA Game Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,327
#1,327
Notorious B.E.N said:
I think if he was go to to Miami, they wouldn't play that kiddy cancer crap. Miami needs a big man, Oden aint gonna cut it.
Click to expand...

You would definitely need a veteran, winning team. Miami, OKC and Clippers come to mind. Maybe he just quits on bad teams. His knees might be shot too.
 
#1,337
#1,337
I don't like Bynum to LA...Jordan is great...Perkins, not so much. Birdman is good, but Bynum would help if he plays OK. I think it would be best for both if you sign him to a cheap one year deal. Get a championship now, while he plays for a bigger contract for 2015
 
#1,338
#1,338
Korver had 20 points on 11 shots, 5 rebounds, 3 steals, and 1 block (1 foul) to lead the Hawks to a 3-point win over Houston (with no Horford). Can't understand why this guy is the joke of this message board. He won't lose you any games, but he'll contribute to quite a few wins...he'll even win you some big games "on his own", too.
 
#1,339
#1,339
n_huffhines said:
Korver had 20 points on 11 shots, 5 rebounds, 3 steals, and 1 block (1 foul) to lead the Hawks to a 3-point win. Can't understand why this guy is the joke of this message board. He won't lose you any games, but he'll contribute to quite a few wins...he'll even win you some "on his own", too.
Click to expand...

He's good, not great.
 
#1,340
#1,340
I would probably agree with that. I mean, what do we consider to be great? The top 10 players? The top 20? I might have called him great, but if you ask me to define great I would probably say top 20 and he's not that.
 
#1,341
#1,341
n_huffhines said:
I would probably agree with that. I mean, what do we consider to be great? The top 10 players? The top 20? I might have called him great, but if you ask me to define great I would probably say top 20 and he's not that.
Click to expand...

Lol not great was kinda sarcastic, hes just good.
 
#1,342
#1,342
n_huffhines said:
Korver had 20 points on 11 shots, 5 rebounds, 3 steals, and 1 block (1 foul) to lead the Hawks to a 3-point win over Houston (with no Horford). Can't understand why this guy is the joke of this message board. He won't lose you any games, but he'll contribute to quite a few wins...he'll even win you some big games "on his own", too.
Click to expand...

Oh lawd
 
#1,343
#1,343
Ftr I'm never making fun of Korver. There are only a very small handful of guys that can win a game on their own and Korver isn't one of those. Put the best defender on him every night like a PG, LBJ, or KD gets and see what his numbers are.
 
#1,344
#1,344
BadJerry20 said:
Ftr I'm never making fun of Korver. There are only a very small handful of guys that can win a game on their own and Korver isn't one of those. Put the best defender on him every night like a PG, LBJ, or KD gets and see what his numbers are.
Click to expand...

So was Harden not guarding him last night?

Why are they relevant to this conversation? Nobody is on KD or LJ's level. Nobody else in the entire league.
 
#1,346
#1,346
n_huffhines said:
So was Harden not guarding him last night?

Why are they relevant to this conversation? Nobody is on KD or LJ's level. Nobody else in the entire league.
Click to expand...

One night does not equal being the focus of a teams defense for a year.

I was naming great players that can win games "on their own", cause you said Korver could. Thus making them relevant to the conversation.
 
#1,348
#1,348
BadJerry20 said:
One night does not equal being the focus of a teams defense for a year.

I was naming great players that can win games "on their own", cause you said Korver could. Thus making them relevant to the conversation.
Click to expand...

"Winning on your own" doesn't actually have meaning, cause in reality nobody can, IMO. Take Korver out of the lineup last night and they lose by 10+. Whatever you may call that, that's what I mean by "winning on your own".
 
#1,349
#1,349
n_huffhines said:
"Winning on your own" doesn't actually have meaning, cause in reality nobody can, IMO. Take Korver out of the lineup last night and they lose by 10+. Whatever you may call that, that's what I mean by "winning on your own".
Click to expand...

You don't know that they would have lost by 10. Someone else may have stepped up.
 
New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top