BadJerry20
Internet Super Hero
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2012
- Messages
- 65,901
- Likes
- 8,576
This makes no sense. Let's put this in perspective...
If you take your sales team from $1 million in sales to $1.2 million...
and I take my sales team from $200K to $800K...
you're a more valuable salesman to your team than I am to mine?
Nobody has answered this question.
All Jerry did is dispute that Love outperformed Lebron that year, which I agree with...for the 3rd time. What I'm trying to do is understand the madness behind what you guys think makes an MVP.
So who is more valuable to his team? The guy who generates $600K in sales, or the guy who generates $200K?
If you really want to nitpick the word valuable, shouldn't it go to the player who gets paid the least that you get the most out of? I have no idea who makes how much money but someone like Aldridge probably doesn't make too much but outperforms his contract? Maybe he's a bad example.
If you really want to nitpick the word valuable, shouldn't it go to the player who gets paid the least that you get the most out of? I have no idea who makes how much money but someone like Aldridge probably doesn't make too much but outperforms his contract? Maybe he's a bad example.
I didn't actually say they would have won 0 games. I asked a hypothetical question. I also have already explained that it was a thought exercise, but here I am again telling you that I don't actually think Love takes them from 0 to 40.
Timberwolves would have been the worst team of all time without him.
Just so we're on the same page....
If the Heat would win 40 without Lebron and the win 60 with him...
and the T-Wolves win 0 games without Love and 40 with him...
You are saying Lebron is more valuable to his team than Love is to his?
What does this have to do with Love and LBJ?
