Napier appreciation thread

#1

Jpcisco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
1,031
Likes
3,705
#1
I will never understand the reasoning of going for 2 after the TD to cut it to 11. Can he count past 10? 9 or 10 its still a 2 score game. No possible excuse. It seemed to me he was just lost at what to do so he panicked and went for more points. If not for that idiotic move, they only need 3 after the on-side kick. Thanks for being dumb! About time shoe is on the other foot.
 
#11
#11
images
 
#16
#16
That stuff won't get questioned in the sunbelt but he is going to get grilled on that decision, as he should.
 
#17
#17
I will never understand the reasoning of going for 2 after the TD to cut it to 11. Can he count past 10? 9 or 10 its still a 2 score game. No possible excuse. It seemed to me he was just lost at what to do so he panicked and went for more points. If not for that idiotic move, they only need 3 after the on-side kick. Thanks for being dumb! About time shoe is on the other foot.

He's thinking he needed 45 to tie, not just 38.
 
#18
#18
He was afraid we’d score again. By going for two he would’ve made it a 9 point game. So if we scored it would’ve been 16.

He was trying to keep it at two possessions because he had no confidence in his defense
Still left his team chasing points the rest of the game. Dumb, glad he is on that side.
 
#20
#20
He was afraid we’d score again. By going for two he would’ve made it a 9 point game. So if we scored it would’ve been 16.

He was trying to keep it at two possessions because he had no confidence in his defense

I never thought about that. It definitely seemed pretty stupid at the time and after the game. Especially after we almost snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. I think if we ran a regular offense down the stretch we don't make this a nail biter.
 
#23
#23
Spread was 10.5, right? By not getting the 2 point conversion, the lead stayed at 11 instead of going to 9. Just sayin'...
 
  • Like
Reactions: wmcovol
Advertisement



Back
Top