Nancy Pelosi

Eric really wants to lean into that water carrying with the phrase “with all that stock trading”? LMAO
Pelosi’s brain has a hammer shaped hole. He’ll probably get the criminal charges dismissed when he forks over money to pay for the car and hopefully CA takes his license away.

I’m bummed the home invasion thread didn’t get bumped for this. One of the all-time greats on this forum.
 
Case will be „settled“ with a small fine and/or a few hours of cooperation service (if it isn’t just quietly dropped outright)
You’re as crazy as the guy who smashed his brains in if you think paying restitution and losing driving privileges isn’t the appropriate outcome for a guy who has to be pushing 90 because he hit a parked car and drove away.
 
You’re as crazy as the guy who smashed his brains in if you think paying restitution and losing driving privileges isn’t the appropriate outcome for a guy who has to be pushing 90 because he hit a parked car and drove away.
It is the „and run“ part that should make all of the difference. If he would have reported his mishap and waited on police, then restitution would have been appropriate. He ran. Not cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smallvol#1
It is the „and run“ part that should make all of the difference. If he would have reported his mishap and waited on police, then restitution would have been appropriate. He ran. Not cool.
“Not cool” for late 80’s with minimal criminal history makes restitution appropriate. Touch grass, psycho.
 
It is the „and run“ part that should make all of the difference. If he would have reported his mishap and waited on police, then restitution would have been appropriate. He ran. Not cool.

Curious to why he left the scene. Was he intoxicated? Riding around in his boxers with another person in their boxers? Was Nancy drunk dialing him, causing him to lose focus off the road?
 
Last edited:
You’re as crazy as the guy who smashed his brains in if you think paying restitution and losing driving privileges isn’t the appropriate outcome for a guy who has to be pushing 90 because he hit a parked car and drove away.

With their connections within the state, it’s doubtful he’ll have his driving privileges revoked.

May have to be chauffeured against his will.
 
With their connections within the state, it’s doubtful he’ll have his driving privileges revoked.

May have to be chauffeured against his will.
Only way to justify letting him keep driving, in my opinion, would be if he was on his way to some sort of legitimate and well-documented emergency. Seems unlikely.
 
Pelosi’s brain has a hammer shaped hole. He’ll probably get the criminal charges dismissed when he forks over money to pay for the car and hopefully CA takes his license away.

I’m bummed the home invasion thread didn’t get bumped for this. One of the all-time greats on this forum.

Probably the "right" answer feels like restitution, non-jail punishments at upper end of guidelines, and a cognitive test to determine if he should be driving after those non-jail punishments are served....
 
Probably the "right" answer feels like restitution, non-jail punishments at upper end of guidelines, and a cognitive test to determine if he should be driving after those non-jail punishments are served....
I imagine he’s already been referred for the test.

Upper-end punishments and cognitive test seems inconsistent to me. If we think he has diminished capacity then why are we punishing above the norm?
 
I imagine he’s already been referred for the test.

Upper-end punishments and cognitive test seems inconsistent to me. If we think he has diminished capacity then why are we punishing above the norm?
Maybe because of his 2022 DUI arrest and conviction. It’s not like he has a spotless driving record or anything
 
Maybe because of his 2022 DUI arrest and conviction. It’s not like he has a spotless driving record or anything

Ultimately, he got the bottom end of ranges for first time offenders less than 4 years ago. If he got anything other than the bottom, he'd potentially be looking at a probation issue now (assuming competence)

If he is competent still, he shouldn't be at the bottom of the ranges again given the short time period involved.

If he isnt competent, different discussion.
 
I imagine he’s already been referred for the test.

Upper-end punishments and cognitive test seems inconsistent to me. If we think he has diminished capacity then why are we punishing above the norm?

Makes sense. Just wanted to cover bases if he is still deemed competent....
 
Makes sense. Just wanted to cover bases if he is still deemed competent....
If it was me, I’d be telling him to go in and offer to skip the test, surrender his license, pay for the damage, and hopefully come up with a good excuse for why he left.

Who knows. I mentioned it the other day, but James Pearce really ****ed my expectations.
 
Same here and how did I escape my teens and twenties mostly intact? Then there was the one time driving my 911 home from a dinner date, in my mid 20s, got stopped for dodging the potholes near my house and arrested for DUI without a breath test because I admitted to the one glass of wine I had had with dinner.
That sucks. Me and my friends were caught red handed once at a rock quarry. There were five of us in the car and had a half gallon of rot gut whiskey being rotated along with two joints when we heard a knock on the window.
My friend rolled down the window and when the cop shined his flashlight in the car it looked like a rock concert back in the old days….. smoke from hell. He took the guy’s weed and our booze and told us to get back into town. We were mostly glad he let us off, but pissed that he took the weed. I’m sure he kept it for himself
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave

Advertisement



Back
Top