volsfan24018
Big Orange Fanatic
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 2,196
- Likes
- 3,360
This post is both biased and accurate at the same time.The point is actually to discredit the rankings themselves. Casual college football fans consider these rankings to be the forgone consensus on whether a player is going to be good or not. We're pointing out how our elite players consistently drop out of elite status because:
- It's BS
-If we keep pointing it out, maybe people will start to realize that the opinions of our coaches matter more than an arbitrary ranking system made by analytics nerds who have never stepped in a locker room before.
NFL has zero to do with college. So no your argument holds zero weight.Oh my, again, NFL draft data trumps HS stars. Half the 300 4 stars each class are passed by 3 stars when graded out over 3-4 years. HS Stars are not guarantees (see Nico) or ceilings (see the masses of late bloomers). NFL rosters prove that in spades. Portal is a newer tool to measure the fallibility of rating 16-18 year olds.
So your position is that their PERFORMANCE in college does not establish their draft stock? Four star 5th rounders say different. 4 star un drafted speaks louder!NFL has zero to do with college. So no your argument holds zero weight.
