If y’all remember, I said this class could change TN for the next decade. Has the potential to be one of the best classes we’ve ever had, and that’s saying something.
Think we’re gonna land several Big time guys this class.
If y’all remember, I said this class could change TN for the next decade. Has the potential to be one of the best classes we’ve ever had, and that’s saying something.
Think we’re gonna land several Big time guys this class.
If y’all remember, I said this class could change TN for the next decade. Has the potential to be one of the best classes we’ve ever had, and that’s saying something.
Think we’re gonna land several Big time guys this class.
If y’all remember, I said this class could change TN for the next decade. Has the potential to be one of the best classes we’ve ever had, and that’s saying something.
Think we’re gonna land several Big time guys this class.
If y’all remember, I said this class could change TN for the next decade. Has the potential to be one of the best classes we’ve ever had, and that’s saying something.
Think we’re gonna land several Big time guys this class.
This is key. CRG's experience is pulling kids. And with each elite player he gets and continues to develop, the more will continue to sign and become VOLS
He’s rated by on3, straight up, at 204, everyone else has him as a solid 5*. ON3 is usually the most accurate. Must be a misprint or complete miss by them.
He’s rated by on3, straight up, at 204, everyone else has him as a solid 5*. ON3 is usually the most accurate. Must be a misprint or complete miss by them.
I disagree on the accuracy of On3. They have a few good rankings but overall they overank and underhand a bunch of kids to bring attention to their site. I still think 247 is still the most accurate
He’s rated by on3, straight up, at 204, everyone else has him as a solid 5*. ON3 is usually the most accurate. Must be a misprint or complete miss by them.
Can you share the data you have that shows on3 is the most accurate at rating recruits? What metrics were used in this data? Did you, or has someone, analyzed their individual recruit rankings for multiple years vs on-field college production? Imagine that would be difficult seeing as how on3 only started in 2021 but I’m very interested in which metrics you’re using.
He’s rated by on3, straight up, at 204, everyone else has him as a solid 5*. ON3 is usually the most accurate. Must be a misprint or complete miss by them.