I think it depends. He didnt allow James Banks back, and Banks was producing far more then Morley.
As for whether Fulmer should take any blame...yes he doesnt take their tests for them, but he is a babysitter. All college coaches are to a certain degree. These are kids being thrust into the limelight, playing on national tv in front of thousands in person and millions more on tv, held as gods on campus. I imagine it could be a lot to take in.
My main issue is that this seems to happen more often then not with our better players being lost to off-field problems. Banks, that Lee Smith recruit, Bret Smith, now Morley. There has to be some accountability with the player, and some accountability with the program. Its not the program's fault he failed a test, but maybe it is the program's fault that he didnt get more (or better help)...or maybe not enough discipline.
Considering it was fall semester of his sophmore year and his grades were good enough this semester...that means that his grades were very poor last year. So going into this fall there was already proof that he was strugging very bad. You dont just mess up your last semester and get kicked on...its a gradual process of poor performances. And yet Fulmer was starting him...maybe he had no choice talent-wise, but Fulmer should have known that Morley was borderline failing out. Could he and should he have done something? Yeah I think so. But maybe he did and we just dont know.