More Climate BS...

Was listening to NPR last night (unpleasant; but keep an eye on what your enemy is up to).
They were still talking about global warming as if it were a confirmed fact. It was a „report“ on how increased CO2 was allegedly reducing the nutrient content of foods. They were seriously trying to claim that the gas that causes plants to grow is hurting plants. And they wonder why no thinking human takes them seriously anymore.
They seriously were making the claim that one of required ingredients for photosynthesis is bad?
 
I have seen one study on this that actually supports it. my understanding is that the increased CO2 allows the plant to grow/ripen faster, but CO2 doesn't likewise increase nutrient absorbtion/"development" speed in the fruit. and due to that the plant doesn't have as much time to get the fruit as nutrient rich as they otherwise would. kinda like the mega-farms who use chemicals to get fruit ripe at the same time aren't as nutrient rich as home grown less GMO produce.

but that report pointed towards over planting/no crop rotations as a contributor as well.
Perhaps a case of correlation not causation? But I'd be still be surprised. Sounds like another desperate attempt to keep hope alive by the climate cult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
Nutrient content has nothing to do with CO2 levels, it depends on the weather and soil quality. CO2 is absorbed by plants during the day and they release oxygen at night. CO2 is essential for plants, the relationship between plants and animals is perfect and magical.
Anyone who says CO2 is a pollutant is a moron or a liar. We would actually benefit from higher levels of CO2. Facts.
Wasn't there test some decades back where they actually pump high levels of CO2 into a patch of woods and the results were the plants were significantly better than the control group? Did not feel like looking it up.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top