marcusluvsvols
Blue collar skoller
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 17,025
- Likes
- 31,759
99% of international climate scientists: We're causing global warming.I doubt many here are surprised you believe that. Al Gore would be proud. He would still be FOS like always, but proud. Anything to keep the grift going.

you realize the pre-Industrial era was a Little Ice Age right?99% of international climate scientists: We're causing global warming.
You: It's a grift.
Current Scientific Consensus (as of December 2025)
View attachment 797896
- The planet has warmed ~1.2–1.3 °C above pre-industrial levels (NASA, NOAA, HadCRUT5, Berkeley Earth, Copernicus).
- Human emissions of CO₂, methane, and other greenhouse gases are the primary driver of that warming (IPCC AR6 2021, U.S. National Climate Assessment 2023, WMO State of the Global Climate 2024).
- 99–100% of actively publishing climate scientists agree on the above two points (Lynas et al. 2021, Myers et al. 2022, Powell 2023 updates).
- Every major scientific academy on Earth (NAS, Royal Society, Chinese Academy of Sciences, etc.) endorses this view.
99% of international climate scientists: We're causing global warming.
You: It's a grift.
Current Scientific Consensus (as of December 2025)
View attachment 797896
- The planet has warmed ~1.2–1.3 °C above pre-industrial levels (NASA, NOAA, HadCRUT5, Berkeley Earth, Copernicus).
- Human emissions of CO₂, methane, and other greenhouse gases are the primary driver of that warming (IPCC AR6 2021, U.S. National Climate Assessment 2023, WMO State of the Global Climate 2024).
- 99–100% of actively publishing climate scientists agree on the above two points (Lynas et al. 2021, Myers et al. 2022, Powell 2023 updates).
- Every major scientific academy on Earth (NAS, Royal Society, Chinese Academy of Sciences, etc.) endorses this view.
Go tell China and India. Last I heard, they're still the biggest problem, not America.99% of international climate scientists: We're causing global warming.
You: It's a grift.
Current Scientific Consensus (as of December 2025)
View attachment 797896
- The planet has warmed ~1.2–1.3 °C above pre-industrial levels (NASA, NOAA, HadCRUT5, Berkeley Earth, Copernicus).
- Human emissions of CO₂, methane, and other greenhouse gases are the primary driver of that warming (IPCC AR6 2021, U.S. National Climate Assessment 2023, WMO State of the Global Climate 2024).
- 99–100% of actively publishing climate scientists agree on the above two points (Lynas et al. 2021, Myers et al. 2022, Powell 2023 updates).
- Every major scientific academy on Earth (NAS, Royal Society, Chinese Academy of Sciences, etc.) endorses this view.
that's because 99% are in on the scam to get funding99% of international climate scientists: We're causing global warming.
You: It's a grift.
Current Scientific Consensus (as of December 2025)
View attachment 797896
- The planet has warmed ~1.2–1.3 °C above pre-industrial levels (NASA, NOAA, HadCRUT5, Berkeley Earth, Copernicus).
- Human emissions of CO₂, methane, and other greenhouse gases are the primary driver of that warming (IPCC AR6 2021, U.S. National Climate Assessment 2023, WMO State of the Global Climate 2024).
- 99–100% of actively publishing climate scientists agree on the above two points (Lynas et al. 2021, Myers et al. 2022, Powell 2023 updates).
- Every major scientific academy on Earth (NAS, Royal Society, Chinese Academy of Sciences, etc.) endorses this view.
Praise Jebus!you realize the pre-Industrial era was a Little Ice Age right?
of course we are above that.![]()
Little Ice Age (LIA) | Britannica
Little Ice Age (LIA), climate interval that occurred from the early 14th century through the mid-19th century, when mountain glaciers expanded at several locations, including the European Alps, New Zealand, Alaska, and the southern Andes, and mean annual temperatures across the Northern Hemispherewww.britannica.com
doesn't mean man caused that. we have just been returning to average, and the scientists are confusing correlation with causation because that is what their funding wants them to find.
and you might want to actually check what the actual science says. because its not nearly as black and white as the press releases claim.
"In an ironic twist of climate science, air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels has a slight cooling effect on the planet, which is the opposite of the warming caused by greenhouse gases. But there’s nothing beneficial about air pollution for the environment or human life. Air polluted by fossil fuels leads to the premature death of around 8 million people globally each year. Tiny particles emitted during fossil fuel combustion can be inhaled, and they can cause asthma, respiratory infections, lung cancer, and heart disease."![]()
Aerosols: Small Particles with Big Climate Effects - NASA Science
Aerosols are small particles in the air that can either cool or warm the climate, depending on the type and color of the particle.science.nasa.gov
"Fossil-fueled air travel, driving, electricity use, and industrial activity all decreased sharply in the spring of 2020. This led to cleaner, clearer air, which caused a slight warming -- up to 0.2 to 0.5° F (0.1 to 0.3° C) -- in some places. "
"If not for aerosol pollution, Earth would be even warmer than it already is. Aerosol air pollution has made the planet about 0.7° F (0.4 °C) cooler than it otherwise would be, according to the 2021 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). For comparison, greenhouse gas emissions have added 2.7°F (1.5°C) of warming.
This makes for an interesting predicament. It might seem that air pollution is oddly helpful to counteract climate change. "
that's because 99% are in on the scam to get funding

Yeah, Hogg 88. Now, dance for @MontyPythonWTF.
Simple question: You disagree with the 99% of climate scientists? Yes or no?
If yes, PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION WHY.
![]()
Antarctica gains ice for first time in decades, reversing trend of mass loss, study finds
A new study finds Antarctica gained mass for the first time in decades, reversing previous loss trends and briefly offsetting global sea level rise.www.livenowfox.com
So you disagree with 99% of climate science nerds, eh?
Can't say I'm surprised. I mean, really, your expertise extending beyond an oil change is a reach, brother.
Did you think about that before you posted it? You know, trends and all.![]()
Antarctica gains ice for first time in decades, reversing trend of mass loss, study finds
A new study finds Antarctica gained mass for the first time in decades, reversing previous loss trends and briefly offsetting global sea level rise.www.livenowfox.com
I acknowledge your failed appeal to authority.Praise Jebus!
@LouderVol knows more about climate change than Ph.D. level international scientists!
You the man!
I'll just go about my merry way - forget about that silly "global warming" nonsense!
Thank you!!!
I remember doing papers on "the mini ice age" in school and not to long after that, "Acid Rain". I don't know how we've made it this through all the climate changes.Of course, you were putting on double face diapers and thinking social distancing was stop you from getting a cold.
Can't say I'm surprised. Just don't blame the rest of the sane.
Some of us are old enough to remember the last scam, humans would cause a new Ice Age.
![]()
