Helton never called plays before last year. Now are you lying to fit your agenda again or just ignorant like usual ? It is one or the other. A first time play caller is the definition of inexperienced. So that is out the way.
You said he lacked experience. That's simply not true. Now you want to change the subject again so you can claim you were right. You really aren't a very intellectually honest person, are you?
So you aren't willing to prove something that the data doesn't support and you expect someone to prove something when the data already supports their position?
Done it ad nauseum... and all you do is handwave and abuse "stats". So no. I have no intention of wasting the hours of time it would take to watch each game from last year to get precise data... that you won't accept any way.
Like I said great trolling strategy. Claim a bunch of stuff that can't be proven without hours of film study. No matter what the numbers say your claims are so nebulous that it takes a long time to prove right or wrong. So we only have the numbers. The numbers say you are wrong like usual.
Your delusion doesn't make my facts and reasoning "trolling".
I said JG would be the guy and QD would transfer. It happened.
That's a bald-faced lie and you have to know that you are doing it. You said JG would start the season... I actually didn't make an ironclad prediction since I had no way of knowing. I just said all the signs pointed to QD... you went nuts and claimed I was making things up then too. I wasn't.... and I haven't since.
I said Dobbs would be the guy. You said he would get his job taken.
Another bald-faced lie. There were guys around claiming that Peterman should start. I said that he shouldn't and that I didn't think he would. I'm glad he found success elsewhere which should make you feel better about JG's prospects of becoming a good QB since Chaney was a factor... but you need to read through those 100's of posts and prove I ever said this. Or maybe you are just "trolling"?
The last thing Pruitt said JG was did great. Don't try to use a halftime quote when he is trying to motivate when we have his thoughts on the whole game. That is dishonest at best.
Don't try to twist it. YOU WERE WRONG and I was right. The issue is not what JG did in that game other than revealing in ironclad fashion that his decision making had been a problem while you claimed it was not. Chaney and Pruitt both revealed it as a point of emphasis for them. I hope he's improved. He looked improved in the first half after looking like the same JG in the first half.
Also the main gripe was once again the oline. Not one word about his comments AFTER THE GAME about the line lacking. Not surprising.
Yeah. I've made some comments about the OL. But to that point... funny how much "better" they looked in the 2nd half when JG's decision making sped up, huh? Predictably, you give JG all the credit and say nothing about the OL pass pro being better as well.
Once again give any shred of proof what you say is true. A stat, a quote. Anything that says he ran "simple " short plays.
And once again, accept a fact... any fact. Just admit that you were wrong for MONTHS about JG's decision making speed being a significant issue... and I'll consider spending some time to review every game and try to count all the slants, short crossing routes, skinny posts, drags, inside curls, inside option routes, etc that he didn't throw. As a bonus, I'll count the number of times he led a receiver on a deep route. You just have to show some REAL indication that you'll accept the TRUTH. So far... you haven't done that the whole time you've been on this board when it comes to JG.
absolutely ridiculous.
