volmoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 3,034
- Likes
- 2,574
I think Chryst’s was 30% when Stanford lost to San Diego State last year...so it can LOSE games.Yeah that TD to INT ratio really proves it............................................................................
Oh my bad I forgot about that elite completion % which is really what wins games right?..right?
There are so many examples to prove you wrong including one from our beloved university. I’ll wait to see if you figure it outIf KC had any ability, he would not have transferred but would be starting for Stanford. Not a great arm, not very accurate, slow runner. He May be able to read defenses better but we really do not know that because he has played so little.
If KC had any ability, he would not have transferred but would be starting for Stanford. Not a great arm, not very accurate, slow runner. He May be able to read defenses better but we really do not know that because he has played so little.
I read a lot more than I post and besides myself, this is this first time someone else has said something about game planning around our deficiencies. That’s what a coach gets paid to do. Coach the team he has. Why does coaches these days have to use their system? Use what you have to the best of its ability.Marucs (sp?)
J/k
KC was a good qb at Stanford, so he knows what he is doing. Doubt it will make much of a different. Olin e is really bad and we dont seem to gameplan for that known weakness.
Wow, looks like we game planned to get the ball away from the line. Theres a step in the right direction.I read a lot more than I post and besides myself, this is this first time someone else has said something about game planning around our deficiencies. That’s what a coach gets paid to do. Coach the team he has. Why does coaches these days have to use their system? Use what you have to the best of its ability.
JG is 64% behind one of the worst OLs in football. KC was 50 some percent behind a good Stanford OL. Ha. What a joke
