McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 49,372
- Likes
- 96,045
pulled this quote and comment from the comment section:
By early July, in the week just after Kelly’s mask order, the COVID-19 incidence rate had risen to 17 cases per 100,000 in the counties that would ultimately adopt the mandate—a 467 percent increase from early June. In the counties that would not adopt the mask order, there had been a 50 percent increase, for an incidence rate of six cases per 100,000.
By mid-August, the 7-day rolling average COVID-19 incidence had decreased by 6 percent to 16 cases per 100,000 in mandated counties. In non-mandated counties, it had increased by 100 percent to 12 cases per 100,000.
So let me get this straight – in mandated counties, the rate of infection plummeted from 17 per 100k all the way down to 16 per 100k? Well, can’t argue that masks sure are effective!
eta: c-south beat me to it.
Here’s an interesting readI’ll need to see the complete chart/graph.
Which approach is most effective at inhibiting viral spread, or are they equally effectiveView attachment 326207View attachment 326208:
might be. but there are a multitude of things which could also account for the reversal.I think the trend is what's interesting. In a month it went from 3 to 17 then down to 16 the next month. Completely reversing the direction of an exploding trend is noteworthy.
Interesting readmight be. but there are a multitude of things which could also account for the reversal.
I find it interesting the non-mandated counties was lower in count than the mandated counties throughout the observed months. Maybe that is a rural versus urban effect.
Throughout all of this it seems the most effective strategies are distancing and frequent hand washing.
I am also waiting for conclusive evidence on asymptomatic transmission.
Oops. Copied wrong linkThat's the same study huff shared.
My son in law tested for antibodies this week. He has them. He and my daughter have been living with us since they married in May. He never had any symptoms of covid. Had symptoms of an allergy a couple months ago. Nobody else in the house, including my daughter (she is negative for anitbodies) caught covid.And I will add, this thing kills really old people with health problems.
I fully realize, as a 47 year old male, I could be dead from this virus next week. But the clear evidence shows this is overwhelmingly a killer of really old sick people.
We have gone insane.
That’s interesting. My boss had her husband test positive a month ago. She and the two kids clean. She was all about how there was no way in hell he had it and she didn’t. He went and got tested bc a coworker he was in close contact with tested positive. She said two days later they escaped for a weekend anniversary celebration. Based on context clues I would say she’s right.My son in law tested for antibodies this week. He has them. He and my daughter have been living with us since they married in May. He never had any symptoms of covid. Had symptoms of an allergy a couple months ago. Nobody else in the house, including my daughter (she is negative for anitbodies) caught covid.
The masks decreased the count to still be above the increased non mask counties. That's some jacked up win.pulled this quote and comment from the comment section:
By early July, in the week just after Kelly’s mask order, the COVID-19 incidence rate had risen to 17 cases per 100,000 in the counties that would ultimately adopt the mandate—a 467 percent increase from early June. In the counties that would not adopt the mask order, there had been a 50 percent increase, for an incidence rate of six cases per 100,000.
By mid-August, the 7-day rolling average COVID-19 incidence had decreased by 6 percent to 16 cases per 100,000 in mandated counties. In non-mandated counties, it had increased by 100 percent to 12 cases per 100,000.
So let me get this straight – in mandated counties, the rate of infection plummeted from 17 per 100k all the way down to 16 per 100k? Well, can’t argue that masks sure are effective!
eta: c-south beat me to it.
might be. but there are a multitude of things which could also account for the reversal.
I find it interesting the non-mandated counties was lower in count than the mandated counties throughout the observed months. Maybe that is a rural versus urban effect.
I dont think it's too unusual. Looks like there is usually a pretty steep drop in cases. In pretty short times.I think the trend is what's interesting. In a month it went from 3 to 17 then down to 16 the next month. Completely reversing the direction of an exploding trend is noteworthy.
I dont think it's too unusual. Looks like there is usually a pretty steep drop in cases. In pretty short times.
Google Image Result for https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/f34d2c292ca8f328e6116095564fdafd1d1011bb/0_0_850_685/master/850.jpg?width=700&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=e757479c447c2b989bb361754aa20d13
I think the trend is what's interesting. In a month it went from 3 to 17 then down to 16 the next month. Completely reversing the direction of an exploding trend is noteworthy.