Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

So my next question is if this vaccines is a manufactured herd immunity, why would that immunity be less susceptible to a 2nd infection than one developed thru exposure?

Seems like we would need multiple vaccines over time. Which would mean even with a vaccine we are still going to have future spikes.

It entirely depends on the nature of the virus, and with SARS CoV-2 we know very little right now.
 
It entirely depends on the nature of the virus, and with SARS CoV-2 we know very little right now.
I would think these guys pushing vaccines have to know something. Not expecting that to be public knowledge. But my thinking is that if a vaccine is a valid option, herd immunity is too.
 
Last edited:
Not much of a dictator if the governors are doing what they choose, but you are delusional about him so there's that.

He maintains absolute authoratuh, just ask him.

If they cross him, they get their capitals marched on and he tweets to his minions liberate the State from it's governor.

It's comical that you defend his thuggish behavior after all proselytizing that Obama acted like a King.

You look silly plating this flag of indignation.
 
He maintains absolute authoratuh, just ask him.

If they cross him, they get their capitals marched on and he tweets to his minions liberate the State from it's governor.

It's comical that you defend his thuggish behavior after all proselytizing that Obama acted like a King.

You look silly plating this flag of indignation.
I was talking with a friend about what this is actually called.
Tyranny didnt quiet fit as he isnt setting himself up to be more powerful, and he isnt even saying follow me to liberty to make himself the focus.
Mutiny implies going after the guy at the top.
A purge was the closest we could get, but in this case it's a purge of people who are breaking the constitution (in some people's eyes). So it's not a power ply you typically see in a purge, think Putin or Stalin type moves.
It's not an uprising or rebellion if it has executive support from the top.
He didnt directly support any type of violence.
He wasnt asking the military to step in like a coup.

Not arguing if it's bad or not, I just literally dont know what term after fits. Federaly supported anarchy?
 
I was talking with a friend about what this is actually called.
Tyranny didnt quiet fit as he isnt setting himself up to be more powerful, and he isnt even saying follow me to liberty to make himself the focus.
Mutiny implies going after the guy at the top.
A purge was the closest we could get, but in this case it's a purge of people who are breaking the constitution (in some people's eyes). So it's not a power ply you typically see in a purge, think Putin or Stalin type moves.
It's not an uprising or rebellion if it has executive support from the top.
He didnt directly support any type of violence.
He wasnt asking the military to step in like a coup.

Not arguing if it's bad or not, I just literally dont know what term after fits. Federaly supported anarchy?

Whatever you call it, a federal executive suggesting that States be "liberated" from their elected officials is unprecedented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grey_pilgrim
I honestly haven’t heard about a Dem nominee saying that. Obviously it’s wrong, but a totally different level if a president does it. And yes I would be in favor of impeachment if a dem president did the same thing.

Also I’m not happy about Biden being the nominee, he’s creepy af, and it’s very telling that a lot of the people backing the #metoo movement are silent when it comes to Biden, some even going as far as to delete tweets about it.

I’m probably closer to being libertarian than republican or democrat.
Biden was talking about what he did when he was Vice President.

 
Advertisement

Back
Top