Hunerwadel
Will Trade Racists for Refugees
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
- Messages
- 6,739
- Likes
- 8,727
Those items arent holding it up because it wasnt the one voted on with bipartisan efforts. The Pelosi one is pure trash and should be thrown away. You denied when senators confirmed. Not just anonymous sources from bloggers. spare us from the backpedaling.You are overclaiming what I said.
I was, correctly, suspicious that the tweets coming out from conservative bloggers from their sources were misleading and out of context. Some were incorrect. Most were simply so far out of context as to be wrong. See e.g. demands for corporate diversity. That in fact was simply reporting for the internal government organizations administering some of the funds under a particular subpart. We can argue about the merit of that, but it was specifically narrowed to one part of the administration of funds, under HUD I believe.
Now, the airline emissions thing? I agree with you that has no business being in there.
But I do think that anyone with a semblance of political savvy would realize that the particular provision there was never seriously contemplated and was not what has been holding this up.
Those items arent holding it up because it wasnt the one voted on with bipartisan efforts. The Pelosi one is pure trash and should be thrown away. You denied when senators confirmed. Not just anonymous sources from bloggers. spare us from the backpedaling.
Would you love for the nation to be in dire straits by April 12, Easter Sunday?BREAKING: Trump sets Easter deadline for national coronavirus recovery
President Donald Trump said he would “love” to have the nation recovered and back open for business from the coronavirus by April 12, Easter Sunday.
The correct day would be April 1BREAKING: Trump sets Easter deadline for national coronavirus recovery
President Donald Trump said he would “love” to have the nation recovered and back open for business from the coronavirus by April 12, Easter Sunday.
There's a ton of stuff in it holding it up. They had bipartisanship votes and then Nancy and Chuck intervened with their pork.You are overclaiming what I said.
I was, correctly, suspicious that the tweets coming out from conservative bloggers from their sources were misleading and out of context. Some were incorrect. Most were simply so far out of context as to be wrong. See e.g. demands for corporate diversity. That in fact was simply reporting for the internal government organizations administering some of the funds under a particular subpart. We can argue about the merit of that, but it was specifically narrowed to one part of the administration of funds, under HUD I believe.
Now, the airline emissions thing? I agree with you that has no business being in there.
But I do think that anyone with a semblance of political savvy would realize that the particular provision there was never seriously contemplated and was not what has been holding this up.