Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#6,183
#6,183
Vol737 said:
No, he shouldn’t be in prison and you don’t understand the law or the video evidence.
Click to expand...


It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
 
#6,185
#6,185
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...
Instigate. Funny he was instigating but the “peaceful” protestors were just, protesting. Interesting perspective you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, CagleMtnVol, UT_Dutchman and 5 others
#6,187
#6,187
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...
Rule number one. Never bring your fists to a gun fight.
Rule number two. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics already suck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, NorthDallas40 and Wireless1
#6,192
#6,192
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...

wow, don't try and get any of the facts right


first off he didn't take his gun across state lines. I think the third guy did have a gun. the first guy he shot just got out of prison, and was a child rapist. the second guy was a violent felon. I'm also fairly sure alot of other people there had guns.

why am I trying to argue with Armhairs dumber brother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, GroverCleveland, Vol since 77 and 4 others
#6,195
#6,195
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...
You don’t understand a thing about how that went down. You’re completely ignoring the fact he was attacked and pursued by people rioting and burning down the city. They could have ignored him. Instead they chose to attack, pursue and provoke all on their own.

You also fail to recall one of the pursuing attackers was pulling out a weapon of his own to use against Rittenhouse when Rittenhouse saw this and fired a shot in self defense and blew his arm off. FAFO. Where is your condemnation and disdain for the arsonists that committed multiple felonies that night? I don’t see you objecting to their behavior.
Your willful ignorance and lack of objectivity of the events that took place and how they took place that night is duly noted. You want it to be a certain way and it’s just not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ttucke11, MemphisVol77 and InVOLuntary
#6,198
#6,198
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...

Are you really as woefully ignorant and uninformed as your posts portray you to be?You gotta be trolling right? I mean everybody but you knows that the convicted child sex offender that he blew the bicep off of was pointing a gun at him when he fired? Seriously? Everybody but you? Hell, even CNN after trying to tell you originally it was a phone had to backtrack and say it was a pistol after the video evidence and Mr Nomorebicep’s own sworn testimony in court. You either need to quit talking out of your ass or step up your troll game immensely, cause you really suck at this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LargeOrange1, UT_Dutchman, StarRaider and 3 others
#6,199
#6,199
JOEY’S ALL VOL !!! said:
Are you really as woefully ignorant and uninformed as your posts portray you to be. You gotta be trolling right? I mean everybody but you knows that the convicted child sex offender that he blew the bicep off of was pointing a gun at him when he fired? Seriously? Everybody but you? Hell, even CNN after trying to tell you originally it was a phone had to backtrack and say it was a pistol after the video evidence and Mr Nomorebicep’s own sworn testimony in court. You either need to quit talking out of your ass or step up your troll game immensely, cause you really suck at this.
Click to expand...
It is pretty sad that he is taking up for a child sex offender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LargeOrange1, JOEY’S ALL VOL !!!, StarRaider and 5 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top