So, if we discuss Bear Bryant, General Neyland, Bobby Bowden, or Joe Paterno we can pick certain years of their careers and make a decision on what kind of coach they were based on that?
A "career" is not complete until it's over. With that in mind, yes...absolutely...and those "certain years" are usually the last 3, 4, or 5 years. You are remembered by how you finish. Ask Larry Coker, or even Lou Holtz, how that works.
Bobby Bowden is a good example. So is Phil Fulmer. And so is Joe Paterno. The "separation factor" among those three, at this point, seems to be that while all three suffered a slump...Bowden and Paterno worked their way out of it. Fulmer made one bad move after another, and it ended up costing him his job. 29-21 over his last five years. Those are Kentucky numbers.
Bear Bryant and The General went out on top of their game. Fulmer went out under a 5-7 cloud, and two losing seasons in his last four.
There is no comparison between the three. Odds are, the same will apply when Bowden and Paterno retire. There's a HUGE difference between retiring, and being fired.
If you are, in fact, a "football ref", then you of all people should understand...it ain't about what you do in the second quarter...it's what you do for all four quarters. That is where Phil Fulmer, and his career, falls short.
Go Vols.