If we lower the expectations to sweet 16s "on a regular basis", then of course she can be successful. Wasn't good enough for Holly. People were already calling for her head after her second season, and it had already reached a fever pitch after year four. 3 elite 8s and a sweet 16 wasn't good enough, and a 25-8 wasn't good enough because it ended in the second round of the tournament. And I'm not saying that was acceptable, just that there shouldn't be a double standard. If it wasn't good enough for Holly, it shouldn't be good enough for Kellie.