Kavanaugh Confirmation

#7,629
#7,629
Stew Cook said:
Sure, she held the letter at the request of Ford.. someone leaked it and Ford effectively became a pawn. Do you really think it was all a scheme, or just a convenient leak by one or more Senate members, or maybe a staffer.

I'm not buying that it was such a well coordinated conspiracy. Not that it really matters.
Click to expand...
So Ford gave her a letter with an accusation that she didn't want her to do anything with? And then it mysteriously just gets leaked out from.....

Of course not. They could have initiated an investigation and questions that could have been asked by the one person that had the letter in closed meetings and she stayed mute.

But carry on.
 
#7,631
#7,631
BeecherVol said:
What do you consider is the best evidence available that has been discussed to this point?
Click to expand...

There really isn't compelling evidence other than Fords testimony. The Ramirez thing might have more corroboration, which had more specific information.

Again, none of this would be disqualifying, in my view. The FBI could take statements and effectively shut everyone up, if there is nothing to it.
 
#7,637
#7,637
Maybe the whole letting the prosecutor question ole girl and now have pushed her to the side is the right thing. Because the Rs seem to have suddenly found a backbone. Maybe it took a leader like K to nudge them in the right direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and TN-POSSUM
#7,639
#7,639
BeecherVol said:
So Ford gave her a letter with an accusation that she didn't want her to do anything with? And then it mysteriously just gets leaked out from.....

Of course not. They could have initiated an investigation and questions that could have been asked by the one person that had the letter in closed meetings and she stayed mute.

But carry on.
Click to expand...

And breach her confidentiality . This was described fairly well in the hearing.
 
#7,641
#7,641
Stew Cook said:
There really isn't compelling evidence other than Fords testimony. The Ramirez thing might have more corroboration, which had more specific information.

Again, none of this would be disqualifying, in my view. The FBI could take statements and effectively shut everyone up, if there is nothing to it.
Click to expand...
No way you are serious. Her "I cant remember anything" explanation is compelling? No proof is compelling? No witnesses is compelling?

I pity you in a divorce hearing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and Franklin Pierce
#7,644
#7,644
Stew Cook said:
There really isn't compelling evidence other than Fords testimony. The Ramirez thing might have more corroboration, which had more specific information.

Again, none of this would be disqualifying, in my view. The FBI could take statements and effectively shut everyone up, if there is nothing to it.
Click to expand...
Or, the people who are questioning them now (who would receive the results of the FBI questioning) could finish questioning and vote.
 
#7,647
#7,647
Stew Cook said:
The FBI could take statements and effectively shut everyone up, if there is nothing to it.
Click to expand...

There is nothing for the FBI to do, the only witness was present today for questioning, not sure what your point is, you are looking foolish. The committee is in charge of investigating which is what this process is.

Who's statement do you want them to take?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top