Kavanaugh Confirmation

#6,776
#6,776
volinbham said:
Not watching but wonder if Booker will admit his own teenage grabbing as context for his comments
Click to expand...

Every time she talks she acts as if she has no clue what is going on or doesn't understand the question. Then her lawyer interjects and explains what is meant. This is comical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
#6,779
#6,779
CagleMtnVol said:
I think we have done and seen it but how many people in jobs across the country will have accusations made simply because someone might not like you. "He didn't give me that promotion. I'll go to HR and he will destroy him!"
Click to expand...

At this level... every nutjob in the country, just like the nutjob from yesterday who has the same lawyer as Ford since 2001ish. LOL

Heck, guys go to jail for rape... years later.... oh wow, dna doesn't match.... let alone in an office or other place where grabbing is a fileable offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#6,780
#6,780
Stew Cook said:
Do you think K will, or nah?
Click to expand...
I am curious to see his portion. When you remove the partisan grandstanding and look at her answers to the relevant questions, she doesnt look credible. Democrats have taken over their time with pushing an allegation with zero support as if it was filmed and confirmed.
 
#6,782
#6,782
This is about the point in the hearing when everyone thought Clarence Thomas was finished.
 
#6,783
#6,783
theFallGuy said:
Every time she talks she acts as if she has no clue what is going on or doesn't understand the question. Then her lawyer interjects and explains what is meant. This is comical.
Click to expand...
It was a little surprising to me that she said earlier in the hearing that she didn't know what "exculpatory" meant, as in exculpatory evidence.
 
#6,786
#6,786
CagleMtnVol said:
I think we have done and seen it but how many people in jobs across the country will have accusations made simply because someone might not like you. "He didn't give me that promotion. I'll go to HR and he will destroy him!"
Click to expand...
That possibility always existed.

The Democrats waiting till the last minute was intended to torpedo the vote. When Kavanaugh is not confirmed or removed by Trump and no vote happens until after the midterms, the Democrats will nod, smile, pat each other on the back, and remember how well that worked and how the media did it's job playing along.

If the Republicans still control the vote after midterms it's all for nothing, but similar tactics will probably be used in elections now. Day before a vote, some candidate in a close vote state will have a sexual assault claim made against him. Then the MSM will spend the remaining time demonizing said candidate with no proof brought forth. No time for an investigation, no time for anything other than a denial, but as we've seen the past couple of weeks, the MSM says the accuser must be believed.
 
#6,787
#6,787
txbo said:
This is about the point in the hearing when everyone thought Clarence Thomas was finished.
Click to expand...
If the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill hearings occurred today and not in 1991, he would have been finished too. Different climate. Just the accusation of doing this, even if it isn't or can't be corroborated, is much more likely to do you in today than it was even a few years ago. Much less 30 years ago.
 
#6,791
#6,791
Big Gucci Sosa said:
Yes we always said offsite brainstorming. I did 3 years at the state level. Lost all faith in the system and the national media. I'm very anti now and not afraid to speak my mind about the BS.
Click to expand...
I've been at the Federal level for over 10 and see some bad things but also see the total opposite of the stereotype
 
#6,794
#6,794
Matt2496 said:
I hear everyone saying that she was compelling. Do we destroy someone because somebody's testimony was compelling? Or do we base it on facts?

If the vote gets canned over this, an extremely dangerous precedent will be established. We could see the collapse of American society as we know it.
Click to expand...
Let me key you in on things. We have two parties that care more about politics that right/wrong. One of those parties have made bullying an art form, the other party has made fear, trepidation and submission an art form.

This is what you get.

Oh... And when enough people get sick of it... Trump is what you get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, AirVol and Matt2496
#6,798
#6,798
She has basically offered nothing new, nothing that can be really collaborated in any way. The one thing that she could have gotten collaboration on i.e. party, there really doesn't seem to be any collaboration.

Since she is not offering any information there really isn't much to talk about, or to verify because there isn't anything to verify. (Nice)

It could be the other people are not remembering correctly, but she is the one that can't remember anything. Most of her story really doesn't make sense once everything is placed in a single pile. She comes off to me as slightly strange, but that could be nerves but I would say its more than that... maybe immaterial, maybe not... story really doesn't make sense in anyway. If she said she was drunk or stone I would be more likely to believe her story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
#6,800
#6,800
LSU-SIU said:
She has basically offered nothing new, nothing that can be really collaborated in any way. The one thing that she could have gotten collaboration on i.e. party, there really doesn't seem to be any collaboration.
Click to expand...
Wait till the next accuser comes before the committee or they vote on K tomorrow. I think they will vote on K tomorrow. What do you think and why? Should there not be an investigation into the claims or ram it through?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top