Kavanaugh Confirmation

The R's on the committee are going to regret forfeiting their opportunity to question her directly unless the prosecutor has some dirt she's holding back.
 
Don't forget that whoever drove her home hasn't come forward either.

Its so bizarre its embarrassing, if she was drunk she should say so. Details get hazy after 35 years, and if this happen I'm sure some of this would get blurred in the moment. However, if she can't remember how she got home than you have serious issues about credibility because she ran out of the house... that is not something you forget... and since nobody has collaborated there was party.... no wonder nobody has come forward to say they gave her a ride home. She would have had to find a real phone to call home or similar.
 
How much did the Dems pay her? Money grab.
I don't know if I believe the Dems paid her. She could very well be telling the truth as of how she remembers it. My problem is that there is a huge amount of doubt with the situation and without others supporting her story, I cant go along with "convicting" someone just on the basis of that.
 
Her comments about an intensely-stressful situation solidifying memories were definitely true. However, further details (including her way home) should be very clear, as well, unless she was profoundly intoxicated.
 
Her comments about an intensely-stressful situation solidifying memories were definitely true. However, further details (including her way home) should be very clear, as well, unless she was profoundly intoxicated.
Exactly, that is what I would remember... the walk home... drive home, etc.

Has no idea who paid for her phony polygraph. LOL
 
Judging a situation simply by the testimony of a woman and without any corroboration or evidence other than that testimony is very much going by blind faith no?

Yet another one that cannot read what I said in this very thread. Good grief, if you cannot be bothered to read my opinion of the testimony, please refrain from telling me what it is.
 
Her comments about an intensely-stressful situation solidifying memories were definitely true. However, further details (including her way home) should be very clear, as well, unless she was profoundly intoxicated.

Even if she was extremely intoxicated, she would still be given the benefit of the doubt.
 
I’ve been responding to your stupid comments. Read what I’m responding to before you start your stupid comments.

Again, you are in the deep end. Prolly ought to get your water wings on first. Stop with the straw man posts. It makes everyone think you're stupid. FWIW, I don't think you are stupid. I think you just like to troll.
 
Even if she was extremely intoxicated, she would still be given the benefit of the doubt.

If she were stoned or drunk it would make what she is saying more believable... meaning she believes it, however it would damage her ability to comprehend or put it in question.
 
Has nothing to do with being smart or having degrees. You really ought to do some research on the subject before you wander into traffic.

I don’t have to reasearch it , I’m close to a situation that’s even more traumatic and there’s zero loss of memory . There’s no doubt , no remembering floor plans but forgetting where it happened . Do some people differ of course , some loss of details , of course . I find it odd that the convient details are the ones lost . Just my opinion though .
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
Advertisement

Back
Top