Kavanaugh Confirmation

[SLICKYINC]

 

[NorthDallas40]

Someone had to be the first to accuse Cosby. That all happened years before. And once someone came forward, other victims realized they could, and should, too.

I don't think this is all that unusual.

Cosby didn’t have to pass 6 FBI background checks. But nice comparison though... carrying that moonbat water pail.

 

[roosterjbh]

Avenatti getting involved doesn’t help either woman. Makes me think Veritas is involved here.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Is the Democrat political stunt having an effect on the members of congress? This is blackmail for him to withdraw or suffer the consequences of humiliation. He had his chance. I really thought he was going to cry during the FOX interview.

Thats all it is. Yall can't win and have to resort to scumbag tactics like exploiting women to gain an edge and pull a W for the first time in 4 years. Gonna enjoy watching the blowback on this one in the future.

 

[Stew Cook]

That same suspicion has been used to delay the hearings.

It certainly is.. if and when Republicans do it again, it won't be because they have no choice.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Someone had to be the first to accuse Cosby. That all happened years before. And once someone came forward, other victims realized they could, and should, too.

I don't think this is all that unusual.

Something tells me, and I mean no offense, that you dont know anything about women.

 

[volfanjustin]

Lol. That’s just another day between them. And I guess that was the tweet the alert referred to.

But Trump is fixing to win round 2 RE the defamation case.

very funny reading that wack job call someone else a disgrace or embarrassment

 

[golfballs]

why am I guessing that this will be a recurring pattern. set up a chance to hear them. not enough information to believe them over K, new accuser that must be heard at the last minute, rinse repeat.

And the reason they do it is because they know their idiot mobs will believe whatever they tell them.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Just amazing the Trump is getting in the mud with Avenatti on twitter. Do we as a nation really want him to be focused on twitter wars as opposed to trade wars, NK, and the like?

He shouldn’t agreed. But he loves him some twitter mud slinging.

 

[evillawyer]

Methinks he knows not the distinction between an affidavit and declaration. The declaration was made under penalty of perjury.

Sworn declaration - Wikipedia

 

[BeecherVol]

SIAP, Swetnick’s statement is sworn under penalty of perjury.

Old news.

What happens to her if he is confirmed or not enough see her as credible?

 

[Stew Cook]

very funny reading that wack job call someone else a disgrace or embarrassment

I'm curious what exactly Avenatti has done to make you think he lacks credibility?

 

[FLVOL_79]

SIAP, Swetnick’s statement is sworn under penalty of perjury.

And? That changes things how? You say something happened decades ago with ZERO proof for or against it. Who cares if you swear under oath.

 

[volfanjustin]

SIAP, Swetnick’s statement is sworn under penalty of perjury.

First of all, no prosecutor in the country would go after one of these hacks....I mean women if they were caught lying. Second there is no way to prove it one way or the other so she has nothing to lose

 

[0nelilreb]

You say conspiracy from the beginning?

The Dems came out publicly and said they would not vote for anyone Trump nominated . #Resist

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

SIAP, Swetnick’s statement is sworn under penalty of perjury.

So it IS a trial?

 

[volinbham]

Methinks he knows not the distinction between an affidavit and declaration. The declaration was made under penalty of perjury.

Sworn declaration - Wikipedia

Like Kavanaugh's, Judge's, Smyth's and Leyland's

 

[golfballs]

He really doesn’t have a point. It’s victim-blaming trash.

It has nothing to do about blaming them for being a victim

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Just amazing the Trump is getting in the mud with Avenatti on twitter. Do we as a nation really want him to be focused on twitter wars as opposed to trade wars, NK, and the like?

Calm down Sparky. He's doing both just fine.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Its no wonder Dims think Russia altered the election. These people will literally believe anything anyone says, with zero proof, as long as it fits their agenda.

 

[0nelilreb]

So will tomorrow's hearing contain a parental advisory before it starts?

I just hope they keep the protesters out . It’s going to be crazy enough without them .

 

[evillawyer]

Like Kavanaugh's, Judge's, Smyth's and Leyland's

But unlike Judge, Smyth and Leyland, she's asking to be heard by the Judiciary Committee.

 

[Mick]

Thats all it is. Yall can't win and have to resort to scumbag tactics like exploiting women to gain an edge and pull a W for the first time in 4 years. Gonna enjoy watching the blowback on this one in the future.

I think the R's can counter with kneeling during the national anthem as a wedge issue to get the redhats out to vote.

 

[NashVol11]

It has nothing to do about blaming them for being a victim

Saying victims are part of the problem is so ridiculously backwards

 

[golfballs]

And? That changes things how? You say something happened decades ago with ZERO proof for or against it. Who cares if you swear under oath.

And things that are intentially vague and completely lacking in details which can be disproved. It's 100% BS