Kavanaugh Confirmation

#3,477
#3,477
luthervol said:
That is a horrible and frightening truth. Anyone bringing a false allegation should be locked up for years.
Click to expand...
I agree. If you don't file charges and follow it through. What then, an accusation is an accusation not a guilty verdict but the stain remains. How do you prove a woman or man is making malicious allegations? That's why it's the ultimate grenade.
 
#3,479
#3,479
NurseGoodVol said:
I agree. If you don't file charges and follow it through. What then, an accusation is an accusation not a guilty verdict but the stain remains. How do you prove a woman or man is making malicious allegations? That's why it's the ultimate grenade.
Click to expand...
I think society is finally moving to a point where people will be more likely to file charges. The old days of O'Reilly, Weinstein, Trump, and Cosby aren't what they use to be.
 
#3,480
#3,480
So the committee believes they have identified the mystery girl that Ford said was at the party.

"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," said Howard Walsh, who said he has been "engaged in the limited capacity" of corresponding with the committee on behalf of Keyser.

Woman denies attending party where alleged Kavanaugh assault occurred
 
  • Like
Reactions: centkyvol and SLICKYINC
#3,482
#3,482
luthervol said:
Well that may require an investigation.
Click to expand...
You'd think with such a heinous accusation one would want to immediately bring it to the attention of the confirmation committee so that it can be investigated instead of you know............sitting on it for weeks and weeks before notifying anyone.

Especially when the accuser went through a polygraph weeks earlier. It's almost as if they intentionally waited to the last minute to cause as much disruption as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb and NurseGoodVol
#3,483
#3,483
TheDeeble said:
You'd think with such a heinous accusation one would want to immediately bring it to the attention of the confirmation committee instead of you know............sitting on it for weeks and weeks before notifying anyone.

Especially when the accuser went through a polygraph weeks earlier. It's almost as if they intentionally waited to the last minute to cause as much disruption as possible.
Click to expand...
Could be. Or maybe she was just struggling with her decision of going public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#3,487
#3,487
luthervol said:
That's just it though, how do you know without an investigation? What if a few more women come forward in the next couple of days?
Click to expand...
65 women have already come forward in his defense, and 3 people supposedly at the party with her are saying they weren't there. One was a female friend of hers. I put nothing past your team. The end justifies the means with you folks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#3,489
#3,489
TheDeeble said:
Then why the polygraph weeks earlier?
Click to expand...
I don't know. Maybe she was advised to just in case. Or maybe she was planning on going public, chickened out, and ultimately decided she couldn't live with herself if she didn't go public.
 
#3,490
#3,490
1972 Grad said:
65 women have already come forward in his defense, and 3 people supposedly at the party with her are saying they weren't there. One was a female friend of hers. I put nothing past your team. The end justifies the means with you folks.
Click to expand...
He already admitted to that. Didn't understand why that ethic should be considered an issue.

Now question... Did she name girls that were there with her and those girls denied? Or were there a few girls people assumed would have been with her but weren't?

Big difference.
 
#3,491
#3,491
1972 Grad said:
65 women have already come forward in his defense, and 3 people supposedly at the party with her are saying they weren't there. One was a female friend of hers. I put nothing past your team. The end justifies the means with you folks.
Click to expand...

Do you believe Weinstein, O'Reilly, and Cosby were innocent?
 
#3,492
#3,492
Orange_Crush said:
He already admitted to that. Didn't understand why that ethic should be considered an issue.

Now question... Did she name girls that were there with her and those girls denied? Or were there a few girls people assumed would have been with her but weren't?

Big difference.
Click to expand...
What exactly did I admit? You're suffering with that inability to differentiate between assumptions and reality.
 
#3,500
#3,500
luthervol said:
Do you believe Weinstein, O'Reilly, and Cosby were innocent?
Click to expand...
No. They had multiple women come forward, and a pattern of sexual harassment over a period of years, and none had 65 women come forward to back them up.

Kavenaugh has had one crazy liberal woman come forward, against a lifetime of exemplary behavior. Also, a lifelong friend of hers, a Ms. Keyser, already gave testimony to the committee that she was never at a party where Kavanaugh was in attendance. This is after the crazy bitch named her friend as being there. I honestly think she's crazy. She is so against this appointment that she has threatened to leave the country. Of course, she won't.

P.S. They could easily find another crazy bitch to make something up. Look at all the crazies that got arrested by trying to disrupt the hearings. Your team is f*****g nuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top