Kavanaugh Confirmation

[NorthDallas40]

Sure its a fact.

Was Hatch lying? Repeatedly?

Since K hasn’t changed his own statement to the best of my knowledge sure I’ll go along with that!

 

[Weezer]

Ask Kavanaugh as he told Hatch he was not there.

I'm starting to see why Slice always questions whether you're truly a lawyer.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I believe he's stated that he's never witnessed K act in such a way. I don't believe he's gone back and forth on that.

He has not. That is his only official statement of record on the matter.

 

[evillawyer]

He has not. That is his only official statement of record on the matter.

he's not been consistent. He's denied it took place and he has said he has no recollection. See linked article.

Opinion | Why America Needs to Hear Brett Kavanaugh’s Accuser

 

[T-TownVol]

Analysis | Lindsey Graham’s bizarre defense of not making Mark Judge testify

You said "GOP"

 

[evillawyer]

You said "GOP"

Grassley has also said they're only going to have Kavanaugh and his accuser testify.

 

[T-TownVol]

Grassley has also said they're only going to have Kavanaugh and his accuser testify.

Does not prove your point. Just trying to get this hunt over quickly.

 

[NorthDallas40]

he's not been consistent. He's denied it took place and he has said he has no recollection. See linked article.

Opinion | Why America Needs to Hear Brett Kavanaugh’s Accuser

Once again from your own damn article the ONLY statement by Kavanaugh is:

Judge Kavanaugh has flatly denied any wrongdoing. “I did not do this back in high school or at any time,” he said in a statement.

 

[evillawyer]

Once again from your own damn article the ONLY statement by Kavanaugh is:

I was referring to Judge and that we need to have him testify.

 

[evillawyer]

Does not prove your point. Just trying to get this hunt over quickly.

Grassley heads the judiciary committee. He's as close of a voice for GOP as we're going to get and he said only two people (at most) would be testifying on Monday.

 

[T-TownVol]

I was referring to Judge and that we need to have him testify.

I concur that there is no need to have Judge testify. Ford saying that she does not remember: the date, the house, any other people present at said house, how she got home, or much else in the way of actual FACTS, seems to disprove that this actually happened as she NOW, conviently for the Dems, remembers.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I was referring to Judge and that we need to have him testify.

And in the article he offered two statements. “Flat out denial” and “no recollection of that”. Not much difference and still not what Kavanaugh said! And you replied to MY statement on what Kavanaugh said. You damn people are the inconsistent ones here, bouncing to what ever narrative you can make up to throw as many wrenches in this as you can!

 

[T-TownVol]

Grassley heads the judiciary committee. He's as close of a voice for GOP as we're going to get and he said only two people (at most) would be testifying on Monday.

Once again, not because he does not WANT him to. Not necessary or expedient. I would also say he is bowing to the Dems that do not want Judge to testify on the behalf of K.

 

[evillawyer]

And in the article he offered two statements. “Flat out denial” and “no recollection of that”. Not much difference and still not what Kavanaugh said! And you replied to MY statement on what Kavanaugh said. You damn people are the inconsistent ones here, bouncing to what ever narrative you can make up to throw as many wrenches in this as you can!

Not that it matters, but Judge was the topic of conversation ("I believe he's stated that he's never witnessed K act in such a way. I don't believe he's gone back and forth on that"), to which you introduced Kavanaugh ("He has not. That is his only official statement of record on the matter.")

And no, there is a large difference between the two. If I deny X I have knowledge that X did not take place (assuming I'm not lying). If I have no recollection of X, I'm not taking any position on whether X occurred.

 

[SLICKYINC]

Ole girl still hasn’t responded to emails or voicemails on if she’ll be there or not on Monday.

Reeeeeee Hatch!!

 

[evillawyer]

Once again, not because he does not WANT him to. Not necessary or expedient. I would also say he is bowing to the Dems that do not want Judge to testify on the behalf of K.

I think it's in everyone's interest for Judge to testify. He was the one alleged to be there. If he says it didn't happen, let's get him saying that under oath.

 

[T-TownVol]

Ole girl still hasn’t responded to emails or voicemails on if she’ll be there or not on Monday.

Reeeeeee Hatch!!

She is fund raising

 

[SLICKYINC]

She is fund raising

She is fabricating a story.

 

[Weezer]

I think it's in everyone's interest for Judge to testify. He was the one alleged to be there. If he says it didn't happen, let's get him saying that under oath.

Again, since the accuser is unable to define "there", Judge cannot reasonably be expected to testify if he was "there". If they want to swear him in long enough to say he never witnessed K act in such a way, I'm okay with that. It shouldn't be a marathon questioning used by the Dems to delay proceedings.

 

[T-TownVol]

She is fabricating a story.

Her liberal therapist friends are helping her bring up more repressed memories.

 

[evillawyer]

Well, there we go. Doesn't want to speak about it publicly and will not testify. But he had no trouble publicly talking to multiple media outlets just a few days ago. Crazy how an oath has that effect on people.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I think it's in everyone's interest for Judge to testify. He was the one alleged to be there. If he says it didn't happen, let's get him saying that under oath.

Give him a date, location, and time and maybe he can provide a more detailed statement?

 

[SLICKYINC]

Well, there we go. Doesn't want to speak about it publicly and will not testify. But he had no trouble publicly talking to multiple media outlets just a few days ago. Crazy how an oath has that effect on people.

Hahahahahahaha!!!!

 

[BeecherVol]

I'm sorry, maybe I missed it. Was Kavanaugh not free to decline the nomination? He's a big boy. Let him wear the big boy pants.

Oh how that shoe wouldn't fit if the roles were changed...lol

 

[T-TownVol]

Well, there we go. Doesn't want to speak about it publicly and will not testify. But he had no trouble publicly talking to multiple media outlets just a few days ago. Crazy how an oath has that effect on people.

The tweet and article are about the accuser not accepting the invite yet there Skippy. Your boy Griffin can not read and you blindly post as evidence of your opinion.