Kavanaugh Confirmation

#12,553
#12,553
SLICKYINC said:
That's the person the exboyfriend said Ford coached up on polygraphs.
Click to expand...

She has also been working with the senate judiciary committee as well. It’s why the republicans insisted on her giving her testimony, under oath, and agreed to the follow up fbi investigation (ford)

Now throw in DiFi sitting on it since July and the liberal party has just been fully exposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, AirVol, FLVOL69 and 1 other person
#12,555
#12,555
Obsessed said:
She has also been working with the senate judiciary committee as well. It’s why the republicans insisted on her giving her testimony, under oath, and agreed to the follow up fbi investigation (ford)

Now throw in DiFi sitting on it since July and the liberal party has just been fully exposed.
Click to expand...
All this and the Dems get busted over $600. Moral of the story kids, don't steal because you will repay with interest..
 
#12,560
#12,560
Obsessed said:
She has also been working with the senate judiciary committee as well. It’s why the republicans insisted on her giving her testimony, under oath, and agreed to the follow up fbi investigation (ford)

Now throw in DiFi sitting on it since July and the liberal party has just been fully exposed.
Click to expand...

She's most likely the person that wrote Ford's letter to Feinstein. They were in Delaware together at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SLICKYINC
#12,562
#12,562
NorthDallas40 said:
I’ve already apologized to my wife for the upcoming scandal in our family for dancing on the bar in I believe The Library (we hit several that night) to Louie Louie after we beat Bama my freshman year in 1982. I am waiting for my punishment

Edit: no it was Shout... but I only had one beer dammit!
Click to expand...
If you didn't do the worm, your good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#12,563
#12,563
SLICKYINC said:
Yea someone else surly had to have written that letter. The one she wrote by hand was laughed at by 3rd graders.
Click to expand...

She is the wizard behind the curtain. Handling Ford, communicating with Democratic Senators and deep connections to the FBI. Why do you think they demanded the FBI handle this.

Frankly, that is why this isn't over. You never know what the FBI is going to report.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SLICKYINC and davethevol
#12,564
#12,564
txbo said:
She is the wizard behind the curtain. Handling Ford, communicating with Democratic Senators and deep connections to the FBI. Why do you think they demanded the FBI handle this.

Frankly, that is why this isn't over. You never know what the FBI is going to report.
Click to expand...

DiFi is worried enough she doesn’t want the new fbi report made available to the public.

What’s she trying to hide?
 
#12,567
#12,567
Obsessed said:
DiFi is worried enough she doesn’t want the new fbi report made available to the public.

What’s she trying to hide?
Click to expand...

Her improper communications with a lot of people. She relied on McLean to be able to handle the FBI probe but it looks now like she failed and we got an honest probe.
 
#12,571
#12,571
txbo said:
Here's a pretty decent summary of Ford's inconsistencies. Surprisingly from USA Today.

Christine Blasey Ford's changing Kavanaugh assault story leaves her short on credibility
Click to expand...
Wow pretty strong concluding statement. Pretty sure the rest of the MSM will have a talk with USAT editors.

Open-minded Americans of all stripes should see that — emotions aside — Ford’s testimony is completely devoid of credibility: so much so, that Mitchell told the Senate this week that Ford’s allegations do not even meet the preponderance of evidence standard. That standard, which governs in civil litigation, asks whether it is more likely than not that an event occurred.

Yes, victims must be believed. But Ford is not a victim — at least not of Kavanaugh
Click to expand...
 
#12,572
#12,572
Grand Vol said:
No, he said sitting Presidents should be immune to criminal prosecution since every idiot with an agenda would be filing charges and the President would never get anything done because they'd be tied up in court.

If I recall, he goes on to say it's the Senate's job to kick them out THEN they can criminally prosecute for whatever the reason was.

Sorry if your selective reading and CNN talking points didn't allow you to actually grasp what he was saying.
Click to expand...

None of that is in there, at all, and I haven’t watched CNN by choice in over a decade.
 
#12,573
#12,573
RockyTop85 said:
None of that is in there, at all, and I haven’t watched CNN by choice in over a decade.
Click to expand...

Funny, you know he references Bill Clinton a whole bunch of times in that same article? Especially the point behind Bin Laden and the Paula Jones investigation.

And yes, it certainly is in that paper. Highly inferred for both criminal and civil suits.

One might raise at least two important critiques of these ideas. The first is that no one is above the law in our system of government. I strongly agree with that principle. But it is not ultimately a persuasive criticism of these suggestions. The point is not to put the President above the law or to eliminate checks on the President, but simply to defer litigation and investigations until the President is out of office.32 A second possible concern is that the country needs a check against a bad-behaving or law-breaking President.

But the Constitution already provides that check. If the President does something dastardly, the impeachment process is available.33 No single prosecutor, judge, or jury should be able to accomplish what the Constitution assigns to the Congress.34 Moreover, an impeached and removed President is still subject to criminal prosecution afterwards. In short, the Constitution establishes a clear mechanism to deter executive malfeasance; we should not burden a sitting President with civil suits, criminal investigations, or criminal prosecutions.35 The President’s job is difficult enough as is. And the country loses when the President’s focus is distracted by the burdens of civil litigation or criminal investigation and possible prosecution.
Click to expand...

http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Kavanaugh_MLR.pdf

How is it I read that and saw the method to his words and you, for all your education, can't see that except what you want to see?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top