Kavanaugh Confirmation

[bamawriter]

I just have audio, so I can't make any assessments of her body language, but she makes a decent witness. That said, it would be helpful if she could remember one detail beyond her certainty that Kavanaugh attacked her.

 

[LSU-SIU]

So Now she can't say for sure if she was at the Country Club?

She can't remember if it was one person or two people involved in the assault. LOL So... she is for sure who the two guys are, but can't remember if it involved both of them.

 

[golfballs]

Can we please see a picture of her house? We need to judge whether the door was or was not aesthetically pleasing.

 

[Squints]

She's under oath. She wants to make sure she is telling the truth. I take it seriously, I would hope she is.

No one ever lies under oath. NEVER!

This is a dog and pony show of the first order. It’s BS, and you’ve been duped. Lol.

 

[volfanjustin]

every 5 minutes you get politicians doing politics, then the other 5 minutes you get real questions

 

[Stew Cook]

Prosecutors don't pursue cases without a complaint and credible witnesses.

That's my point, as a specialty you guys would excel in failure.

 

[evillawyer]

Whelan getting the smackdown from Leahy

 

[Orange_Crush]

You guys should be prosecutors, specializing in prosecuting alleged victims. You would be doing them a service.

That's called a "defense", which is good since the general stance is innocent until proven guilty.

So your ideal is that accusers be believed just because they're prejudged to be a victim, and they are immune from having their testimony evaluated for believability? Let's just not have them testify if it's automatically believed and judged as unassailable.

 

[LSU-SIU]

That's my point, as a specialty you guys would excel in failure.

She fails on her own, to be honest she can't even remember the most basic facts including which boy/boys assaulted her. (you don't need sherlock holmes here)

 

[1972 Grad]

This format is a fail. This prosecutor is going to stopped every 5 minutes in the middle of her line of questioning.

That is a huge fail. The prosecutor is working on one thing, and the Democrats another. There isn't going to be time for the prosecutor to reach the end of her line of questioning. Meanwhile the Dems are jerking the tears.

 

[508mikey]

@goober

 

[Matt2496]

The Senators should just shut up and let the prosecutor ask the questions...

 

[volfanjustin]

The Senators should just shut up and let the prosecutor ask the questions...

But then they wouldn't be able to get in their political and social justice crap

 

[volfanjustin]

I just have audio, so I can't make any assessments of her body language, but she makes a decent witness. That said, it would be helpful if she could remember one detail beyond her certainty that Kavanaugh attacked her.

everytime you think she is crying, she isn't. No tears just sounds that way

 

[Stew Cook]

That's called a "defense", which is good since the general stance is innocent until proven guilty.

So your ideal is that accusers be believed just because they're prejudged to be a victim, and they are immune from having their testimony evaluated for believability? Let's just not have them testify if it's automatically believed and judged as unassailable.

No, just that the remarks here have been overwhelming prejudicial, which would be of benefit to actual victims.

 

[Obsessed]

 

[FLVOL_79]

Lol this chick is 100% full of sh!t.

 

[volinbham]

Will be "interesting" to see these caring Democrats turn to vultures when K shows up.

 

[volfanjustin]

Dang! We've got 1000 witnesses now.

now I think that one was about 3000 total

 

[BearCat204]

Does every Democrat on the panel have to give a 5 minute speech about how courageous this woman is? Probably should spend that time to actually get to the point of whether or not she is being truthful here.

 

[Roustabout]

And he demands a fair accountal and deserves that. What’s fair for her is also fair for him.

Be careful what you ask for.

 

[volinbham]

Does every Democrat on the panel have to give a 5 minute speech about how courageous this woman is? Probably should spend that time to actually get to the point of whether or not she is being truthful here.

wait until Kavanaugh shows up - they'll be vicious.

 

[Orange_Crush]

No, just that the remarks here have been overwhelming prejudicial, which would be of benefit to actual victims.

I haven't read all of the comments. And I'm not sure which ones you are defining as "prejudicial". Could you quote some of the prejudicial ones so that i can get an idea of your definition?

By and large I see lots of people who just say they believe her, while giving few reasons as to why they do. I see others pointing out parts of her testimony (or voids in it) that hurt her credibility.

 

[happy-go_vol]

It's interesting. The Dems in the forum are asking for a full hearing and airing of facts to try to get to the truth. The Republicans here have already decided the women are lying having heard no facts.

They need to prove he's guilty, not vice versa. It's called bill of rights

 

[BearCat204]

wait until Kavanaugh shows up - they'll be vicious.

No doubt.