Kavanaugh Confirmation

#3,604
#3,604
volinbham said:
So far of 5 people named or implied by Ford who were supposed to be at the party, only 1 (Ford herself) corroborates the story.

Her friend says she was never at a party that K attended and doesn't remember anything like this incident
Judge says it didn't happen and K was never at the described party
Smyth says the same.
K denies it and says was never at party.

No one has been found who has any first hand knowledge of the event.

Am I missing something?
Click to expand...

You forgot because Trump nominated him, he’s a bad man.

Maybe Trump should’ve nominated Hillary. It would be a waste of money, but can you imagine how those hearings would go? Besides, the FBI would have to investigate her all over again.
 
#3,605
#3,605
volinbham said:
Thursday's a long way away. Is it worth setting up a poll of our own to see who thinks Dr. Ford will indeed testify on Thursday?

My initial answer is "No".
Click to expand...

She won’t, her Prius will break down in the middle of the desert somewhere.
 
#3,606
#3,606
evillawyer said:
Give it a rest cowboy. The Democrats want the GOP senators on the judiciary to do the questioning because they're the ones that are voting. Is it helpful to the Dems that they don't know how to tread around this issue? Yes. But it's also a fair representation of what you're electing when you have a bunch of GOP guys who are out of touch with how many in the nation view the issue and just want to push through with this and get the vote done.

There's no special reason (other than optics) to have a female lawyer doing the questioning. We're not dealing with some esoteric scientific inquiry here.
Click to expand...

Do you buy your bull **** by the pound?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#3,609
#3,609
Weezer said:
Do you buy your bull **** by the pound?
Click to expand...

Both sides have a political rationale (Republicans don't want to look like they're yet again attacking a woman and are out of touch with issues facing women; the Dems want the Republicans to look out of touch with these issues), but only the Dems have a viable non-political reason--the members of the judiciary panel are the ones voting and this is not a difficult factual issue to investigate through questioning (unlike, say, the science behind global warming). So if anyone is definitely playing politics on this issue (i.e., who gets to do the questioning) it's the Republicans.
 
#3,610
#3,610
Weezer said:
Do you buy your bull **** by the pound?
Click to expand...

It’s funny how he thinks those GOP senators are have sat around making up the questions in their no girls allowed he man woman hater club , smoking their stoggies , drinking their whiskey , while they swap playing cards with naked women on them . I’m sure that’s exactly the team who will have put together the questions to ask her .
 
#3,611
#3,611
evillawyer said:
Both sides have a political rationale (Republicans don't want to look like they're yet again attacking a woman and are out of touch with issues facing women; the Dems want the Republicans to look out of touch with these issues), but only the Dems have a viable non-political reason--the members of the judiciary panel are the ones voting and this is not a difficult factual issue to investigate through questioning (unlike, say, the science behind global warming). So if anyone is definitely playing politics on this issue (i.e., who gets to do the questioning) it's the Republicans.
Click to expand...

The Rs don’t have a left leaning media waiting to put a spin on everything that’s said .
 
#3,612
#3,612
evillawyer said:
Both sides have a political rationale (Republicans don't want to look like they're yet again attacking a woman and are out of touch with issues facing women; the Dems want the Republicans to look out of touch with these issues), but only the Dems have a viable non-political reason--the members of the judiciary panel are the ones voting and this is not a difficult factual issue to investigate through questioning (unlike, say, the science behind global warming). So if anyone is definitely playing politics on this issue (i.e., who gets to do the questioning) it's the Republicans.
Click to expand...

Not difficult to investigate but they need the FBI? Dems engaging in delay, delay, delay and the Republicans are the ones playing politics?

I'm going to go with yes, you do buy your bull **** by the pound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, AirVol and Hayezb
#3,617
#3,617
evillawyer said:
Both sides have a political rationale (Republicans don't want to look like they're yet again attacking a woman and are out of touch with issues facing women; the Dems want the Republicans to look out of touch with these issues), but only the Dems have a viable non-political reason--the members of the judiciary panel are the ones voting and this is not a difficult factual issue to investigate through questioning (unlike, say, the science behind global warming). So if anyone is definitely playing politics on this issue (i.e., who gets to do the questioning) it's the Republicans.
Click to expand...
what is the D's viable non political reason?
 
#3,618
#3,618
I say she won't testify... and the reason will be incredible... it will impress everyone in terms of creativity. A lot of folks are working on it as we speak.
 
#3,624
#3,624
Dear Moonbats.

I’ll ask again. Why should we be expected to believe Ford when literally every other single person she has connected to this incident has refuted her version of events?

Sincerely,
A yuge and bigly number of wing nuts.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top