Kavanaugh Confirmation

#3,101
#3,101
lawgator1 said:
First, there is apparently testimony she did tell people at the time. There is definitely testimony that she told people about it six years ago, long before K was a nominee for the S.Ct.

Second, my point was that just because someone waits to tell someone in authority about it does not mean it did not occur.
Click to expand...
Bla, bla, she told the authority's about the death threats a few days ago , bla, bla, but not about the alleged sexual assault from 36 years ago, bla, bla..

Anybody can tell anyone anything they want, bla, bla and it still not be true, bla, bla, even if they tell the same thing to 100 people, bla bla.

I have a picture that shows you wearing UT gear. It's true, because I told other people about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, volfanjustin, NorthDallas40 and 1 other person
#3,103
#3,103
lawgator1 said:
First, there is apparently testimony she did tell people at the time.
Click to expand...

There is? There has been reported rumor that would be generously called second hand hearsay. Beyond that, I haven't seen a statement from anyone saying that Ford told them it happened anywhere close to contemporaneously.

There is definitely testimony that she told people about it six years ago, long before K was a nominee for the S.Ct.
Click to expand...

According to her husband. Great.

Second, my point was that just because someone waits to tell someone in authority about it does not mean it did not occur.
Click to expand...

Agreed. But it makes the charge much more difficult to assess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBlvNTmWrk and FLVOL_79
#3,105
#3,105
evillawyer said:
Independents are breaking strongly in the anti-Kavanaugh direction. 24% support, 43% oppose.
Click to expand...

Yep going to the poll link I saw where you got your sound bite. Here’s the whole quote.

Support for Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation is strongly divided by party lines. Just 9% of Democrats support Kavanaugh’s confirmation, compared to a strong majority of Republicans (70%). A quarter (24%) of Independents support Kavanaugh’s confirmation, while nearly twice as many (43%) oppose.
Click to expand...

And don’t forget the link I showed yesterday to refute your “support is falling” false narrative. Support is very close after the allegations surfaced as it was before. This is a partisan public character assassination of what the testimony under oath thus far points to a good man. Nice job moonbats. GVs right no way you’re a real lawyer.
 
#3,106
#3,106
NorthDallas40 said:
Yep going to the poll link I saw where you got your sound bite. Here’s the whole quote.



And don’t forget the link I showed yesterday to refute your “support is falling” false narrative. Support is very close after the allegations surfaced as it was before. This is a partisan public character assassination of what the testimony under oath thus far points to a good man. Nice job moonbats. GVs right no way you’re a real lawyer.
Click to expand...
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: newarkvol
#3,109
#3,109
lawgator1 said:
First, there is apparently testimony she did tell people at the time. There is definitely testimony that she told people about it six years ago, long before K was a nominee for the S.Ct.

Second, my point was that just because someone waits to tell someone in authority about it does not mean it did not occur.

Saw someone make the interesting point the other day that when men claim they were sexually abused by priests 20-30 years ago, but did not report it until now, everyone believes them. But there is a recoil that the woman is pulling a fast one. Interesting point.






It is a legitimate question for the Senate to ask at a hearing, sure. Not so much for the President to tweet about. Especially a President with such a long and storied past of using and abusing women, paying some of them off and insulting the rest.





I think the basics of her story are well known. If you think that lack of actual rape means no harm, no foul, that's pretty pathetic.
Click to expand...
The "basics of her story" are full of holes, and spotty at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#3,112
#3,112
lawgator1 said:
Nice try.

He's attacking her saying that a 15 year old who would be traumatized by almost being raped or worse did not call the police. Dude, seriously. Even you can see the flaw in that comment.
Click to expand...

How she has handled this is what has destroyed her credibility. She doesn't bring this to light for 30+ years, then rights a letter to DiFi but wants to remain anonymous, yet does an interview with a reporter and takes a polygraph.

This whole thing was orchestrated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79 and NorthDallas40
#3,114
#3,114
hog88 said:
How she has handled this is what has destroyed her credibility. She doesn't bring this to light for 30+ years, then rights a letter to DiFi but wants to remain anonymous, yet does an interview with a reporter and takes a polygraph.

This whole thing was orchestrated.
Click to expand...
Yep. Everything the Dims are doing during the Trump presidency is going to be used against them in the future and it will be hilarious to watch them lose their sh!t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#3,115
#3,115
NorthDallas40 said:
What you are is an Internet troll. Nothing more nothing less. You’re the only one I’ve seen go to the effort to block their profile. “Thanks” is your now go to dismissive reply you use repeatedly when called on your false narratives.

Say hello to OBV at the water cooler for us. 😘
Click to expand...
Thanks!

And by the way, if independents are breaking strongly anti-kavanaugh--and they are--doesn't that suggest that this is not just a partisan issue.
 
#3,124
#3,124
RockyTop85 said:
The me too movement has gone astray, but it was originally supposed to be about empowering women to come forward.

The fact that that original purpose resonated with so many women puts these “why didn’t she come forward sooner” arguments in a dim light. Clearly, most women didn’t and don’t feel comfortable stepping forward about these things.

Reading back over the last 50 or so pages of this thread begs the question how anyone would ever feel like coming forward about sexual assault could be worth it, when the accused is in any way respectable.

Most here on both sides have already made up their minds about who is telling the truth and interperet, twist, or make up purported facts to favor their argument. You know that’s exactly what’s going to happen in Congress. Why would anybody volunteer to be the rope in that tug-of-war?

The whole thing has been ****ed up from the moment some democrat slipped this info to the media, which was clearly done to force Ford to come forward, hoping it would delay the vote or that the republicans would turn off women everywhere with their predictably reptilian attempts to wriggle their wait out from under it.

Meanwhile, there has been shockingly little debate over his actual positions. (None here that I can find.) So why is everyone debasing themselves over this guy? Hard to imagine it’s because they trust the political hacks in Washington. I can only assume it’s out of spite.

That’s your sad commentary on our electorate.
Click to expand...

It's how she came forward! If she had went to to FBI or local LEO when the guy was announced as the nominee she wouldn't be getting the flak she's getting. The way it all went down just reeks of being planned.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement













Back
Top