I find it humorous that, when people refer to the “eye test”, it’s usually only focused on offense. In our two games, we held Florida to an average of 58.5 ppg. Even in that disastrous game in Gainesville, we held them to 12 points below their average. For some more “eye test” perspective, Florida scored 104 points on bama today. They scored a total of 117 points in two games against Tennessee.
If UT wins and gets the 1 seed, it sure does breathe new life into the SEC tourney for seasons to come imo, as it will be the first time in a while that it matters for seeding. Would be a good thing for conference tourneys , I'd think. Helps push back on what so many of us have been saying about these things. I can't imagine UT winning and not being a 1. I also still can't get over losing to Kentucky.
Still going to feel this way after they are 1-2 vs the Vols?
It is debatable because there is more to a resume than 5 games. I’ll admit that it’s better now, but pre-conference tournament, we really had the better resume. They have two less losses because of their conference schedule. We also have 3 non conference wins that are better than any one of theirs. They have metrics and eye test.
Someone said they don't do the Q1 A Q1B type thing, but I could of swore I read an article where committee members talked about wins in this way? I could be mistaken, tho.
