If Davenport got to put some stipulations on the hire and those were that the candidate should have experience as a power 5 AD, then there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
If what Hyams said about Jimmy Haslam wanting Currie is accurate, then Currie was likely going to be the guy one way or another.
I don't see how anyone on the committee could not have known about the situation between Fulmer and Currie, unless that committee member wasn't around the program until after 2008. And even then, I just find it hard to believe it wouldn't have come up in conversation.
Sounds like the only way to have avoided division would have been to name Blackburn the AD before the start of the year. Yet the fact that it didn't happen, says that even then, it wouldn't have been unanimous.
So they say Currie seems like an a$$hole. Well, Nick Saban seems like an a$$hole too, but he's pretty good at his job.
There are a few folks out there that are in an uproar about this hire because of some legitimate insight to the program. However, the majority of folks are in an uproar because they'd hopped on either the Blackburn or Fulmer bandwagons based on what they read in the media and/or on message boards. Yes, it sounds like this whole process could have been conducted better, but I'm not going to pretend to have enough first hand knowledge of the situation to be in an uproar over it.
Hopefully some of these burned bridges can be rebuilt, but one thing's for sure, it'll take time. All we can do is let it play out.
If what Hyams said about Jimmy Haslam wanting Currie is accurate, then Currie was likely going to be the guy one way or another.
I don't see how anyone on the committee could not have known about the situation between Fulmer and Currie, unless that committee member wasn't around the program until after 2008. And even then, I just find it hard to believe it wouldn't have come up in conversation.
Sounds like the only way to have avoided division would have been to name Blackburn the AD before the start of the year. Yet the fact that it didn't happen, says that even then, it wouldn't have been unanimous.
So they say Currie seems like an a$$hole. Well, Nick Saban seems like an a$$hole too, but he's pretty good at his job.
There are a few folks out there that are in an uproar about this hire because of some legitimate insight to the program. However, the majority of folks are in an uproar because they'd hopped on either the Blackburn or Fulmer bandwagons based on what they read in the media and/or on message boards. Yes, it sounds like this whole process could have been conducted better, but I'm not going to pretend to have enough first hand knowledge of the situation to be in an uproar over it.
Hopefully some of these burned bridges can be rebuilt, but one thing's for sure, it'll take time. All we can do is let it play out.
Last edited: