BigOrangeTrain
Morior Invictus
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 81,895
- Likes
- 94,818
Why did he leave OSU after a natty and the #1 defense?
Thanks for this. My first reaction was, "Oh, no...Duke AND Gundy." Honestly, though, I like everything in this analysis. I'm sold.This year, Knowles' PSU team was 34th in total defense and 37th in scoring defense. I didn't know anything about him, so I asked Google Gemini for a scheme and results overview which follows:
I. Defensive Philosophy: The "Safety-Driven" 4-2-5
Knowles calls his scheme a "Safety-Driven Defense." While it is technically a 4-2-5 base (4 defensive linemen, 2 linebackers, 5 defensive backs), it functions differently than standard nickel packages.
- Aggression & Disguise: Knowles views defense through an "offensive" lens. He wants to dictate the tempo rather than react. His hallmark is disguising coverages—showing one look pre-snap and rotating into a completely different one post-snap to trick the quarterback.
- The Three Safeties:The scheme relies heavily on three safeties on the field simultaneously.
- Bandit/Boundary Safety: Plays into the boundary (short side of the field) and is often involved in run support.
- Field Safety: Covers the wide side of the field.
- Strike/Nickel: A hybrid safety/linebacker who covers the slot but also fits the run aggressively.
- The "Jack" Position: This is a hybrid defensive end/linebacker position (sometimes called a "Leo"). Knowles recruits an athletic pass rusher for this spot who can line up with his hand in the dirt, stand up on the edge, or drop into coverage. This moving piece prevents the offense from predicting where the pressure is coming from.
- "Touching" the Quarterback: Knowles tracks a specific metric called "havoc" or "touching the QB." He emphasizes that even if you don't get the sack, physically hitting or moving the quarterback off his spot is the primary correlation to winning games.
II. Statistical Success & Rankings
Knowles has a distinct track record of "build-up" success. At his previous stops (Duke and Oklahoma State), his defenses often struggled statistically in Year 1 as players learned his complex system, but they improved drastically by Year 3 or 4 to become top-tier units. At Ohio State, however, the turnaround was much faster due to the elite talent available.
1. Ohio State (2022–2024)
- The Turnaround: Knowles inherited a defense that ranked #59 in total defense the year prior (2021).
- Results:He produced an immediate turnaround, culminating in one of the nation's best units.
- 2022 (Year 1): Improved to 14th in Total Defense.
- 2023 (Year 2): Ranked 3rd nationally in Total Defense and 2nd in Scoring Defense (11.2 ppg).
- 2024 (Year 3): His unit ranked 1st in the nation in both Scoring Defense and Total Defense.
2. Oklahoma State (2018–2021)
- The Build: Inherited a unit ranked in the 90s.
- Results:The defense improved steadily each year, peaking in his final season with historic numbers.
- 2018 (Year 1): 112th in Total Defense (Struggle year).
- 2020 (Year 3): 1st nationally in 3rd Down Defense; led the nation in defensive touchdowns.
- 2021 (Year 4): The defense was elite, ranking #3 in Total Defense and #1 in the nation in Sacks (57).
3. Duke (2010–2017)
- The Context: Duke was historically a difficult place to play defense due to talent disparities in the ACC.
- Results:Knowles took them from the bottom of the FBS to a respectable, bowl-winning level.
- Early Years: Consistently ranked near 100th.
- 2017 (Final Year): Peaked at 21st nationally in Scoring Defense (20.2 ppg), marking one of the best defenses in Duke history.
It is a pretty cool system. The 3 safety defense is so nice for the RPO game because it is easy to run robber coverages and slow down the slants which have been free against usAbsolutely love the 3 safety 4-2-5/3-3-5. Extremely versatile and easier to disguise looks
Redmond has turned into one of my favorite players. He got picked on a lot early due to inexperience but he continued working and played his way into becoming a solid player. He paid his dues but it will pay off for him and UT.Very complicated system that recruits itself. Lots of versatility for players. I think Redmond would do well in his system.
Not a fan of a 2 backer system, BUT, he's proven it can work and it should make the transition much easier. Diaz flashed the 2, but mixed in the 3 a lot. We shall see.This year, Knowles' PSU team was 34th in total defense and 37th in scoring defense. I didn't know anything about him, so I asked Google Gemini for a scheme and results overview which follows:
I. Defensive Philosophy: The "Safety-Driven" 4-2-5
Knowles calls his scheme a "Safety-Driven Defense." While it is technically a 4-2-5 base (4 defensive linemen, 2 linebackers, 5 defensive backs), it functions differently than standard nickel packages.
- Aggression & Disguise: Knowles views defense through an "offensive" lens. He wants to dictate the tempo rather than react. His hallmark is disguising coverages—showing one look pre-snap and rotating into a completely different one post-snap to trick the quarterback.
- The Three Safeties:The scheme relies heavily on three safeties on the field simultaneously.
- Bandit/Boundary Safety: Plays into the boundary (short side of the field) and is often involved in run support.
- Field Safety: Covers the wide side of the field.
- Strike/Nickel: A hybrid safety/linebacker who covers the slot but also fits the run aggressively.
- The "Jack" Position: This is a hybrid defensive end/linebacker position (sometimes called a "Leo"). Knowles recruits an athletic pass rusher for this spot who can line up with his hand in the dirt, stand up on the edge, or drop into coverage. This moving piece prevents the offense from predicting where the pressure is coming from.
- "Touching" the Quarterback: Knowles tracks a specific metric called "havoc" or "touching the QB." He emphasizes that even if you don't get the sack, physically hitting or moving the quarterback off his spot is the primary correlation to winning games.
II. Statistical Success & Rankings
Knowles has a distinct track record of "build-up" success. At his previous stops (Duke and Oklahoma State), his defenses often struggled statistically in Year 1 as players learned his complex system, but they improved drastically by Year 3 or 4 to become top-tier units. At Ohio State, however, the turnaround was much faster due to the elite talent available.
1. Ohio State (2022–2024)
- The Turnaround: Knowles inherited a defense that ranked #59 in total defense the year prior (2021).
- Results:He produced an immediate turnaround, culminating in one of the nation's best units.
- 2022 (Year 1): Improved to 14th in Total Defense.
- 2023 (Year 2): Ranked 3rd nationally in Total Defense and 2nd in Scoring Defense (11.2 ppg).
- 2024 (Year 3): His unit ranked 1st in the nation in both Scoring Defense and Total Defense.
2. Oklahoma State (2018–2021)
- The Build: Inherited a unit ranked in the 90s.
- Results:The defense improved steadily each year, peaking in his final season with historic numbers.
- 2018 (Year 1): 112th in Total Defense (Struggle year).
- 2020 (Year 3): 1st nationally in 3rd Down Defense; led the nation in defensive touchdowns.
- 2021 (Year 4): The defense was elite, ranking #3 in Total Defense and #1 in the nation in Sacks (57).
3. Duke (2010–2017)
- The Context: Duke was historically a difficult place to play defense due to talent disparities in the ACC.
- Results:Knowles took them from the bottom of the FBS to a respectable, bowl-winning level.
- Early Years: Consistently ranked near 100th.
- 2017 (Final Year): Peaked at 21st nationally in Scoring Defense (20.2 ppg), marking one of the best defenses in Duke history.
I like it because you can mirror your looks on both sides of the field and make a few different things look the same and you can ideally have an apex defender on each side that can equally and adequately defend run/passIt is a pretty cool system. The 3 safety defense is so nice for the RPO game because it is easy to run robber coverages and slow down the slants which have been free against us
I think our box linebackers have had too much responsibility at times and Knowles version really lets them play a little faster and simpler
Although the coaches were desperate after the injuries, kudos that they kept him on the field and let him start to figure things out.Redmond has turned into one of my favorite players. He got picked on a lot early due to inexperience but he continued working and played his way into becoming a solid player. He paid his dues but it will pay off for him and UT.
