Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#7,253
#7,253
lawgator1 said:
Not the ones involving Trump, it would seem.
Click to expand...
Even if true, that'd be only one BB in a barrel full of aggies, with as many or more lefty pedo's as righty. This is a global leader paradox that goes well beyond Trump, regardless of his guilt or innocense. Always was. There's a reason the previous admin had every opportunity to disclose the files, and didn't get close to that keg. There's the fact that Trump may well not be in those files. There's the fact that he could be in those files. There's also the fact that when everyone else in those files is exposed, Trump will become a fine print footnote in the matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#7,259
#7,259
But it's not only Summers who is now under renewed scrutiny. This unpleasant drama also serves to spotlight a seemingly deep and disconcerting link between Epstein and the university itself.

Harvard, America's oldest and wealthiest university, began courting the Brooklyn-born financier in 1992, according to the university's own report commissioned after Epstein's sex trafficking arrest in 2019 and published in May 2020.

At that time, in the early 1990s, Epstein, a former math teacher at Manhattan's Dalton school, had worked for around five years as a trader at investment bank Bear Stearns and recently set up his own investment firm.

In 1992, 'some of the University's most senior leaders met with Epstein to seek his support,' reported the three people tasked by Harvard in 2019 with investigating Epstein's connections to their institution.

In 1998, Epstein would make his first of many donations to the university.


www.dailymail.co.uk

Fall of Harvard's ex-president spotlights university's Epstein ties

Larry Summer's unpleasant drama has cast a spotlight on a seemingly deep and disconcerting link between Epstein and the university itself.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#7,260
#7,260

Dr. Jeffrey Epstein – the Long Island Neurosurgeon Jasmine Crockett Confused with Notorious Pedophile – floats epic revenge he could exact on the congresswoman​


Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, the Long Island neurosurgeon who Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) suggested could be the notorious sex trafficker, told The Post Thursday about the masterstroke of revenge he could dish out on the loud-mouthed congresswoman who dragged his name through the mud.

“I think that I should contribute money to Jasmine Crockett and then let everybody know that she also took money from Jeffrey Epstein,” Epstein told The Post.

Crockett boasted on the House floor this week that she was “gonna expose it all” after her discovery that “somebody named Jeffrey Epstein” donated to the campaign of former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY).

In her rant, the Texas Democrat strongly implied that the Manhasset doctor’s April and August 2020 contributions to Zeldin, who is now head of the Environmental Protection Agency, were actually from the convicted pedophile — despite the fact that the $1,000 donations were made months after the disgraced financier died in a Manhattan jail cell.

1763753602753.png

nypost.com

Exclusive | Dr. Jeffrey Epstein – the Long Island neurosurgeon Jasmine Crockett confused with notorious pedophile – floats epic revenge he could exact on the congresswoman

A creative plan from the Long Island neurosurgeon.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and Vol since 77
#7,261
#7,261
GVF said:
Even if true, that'd be only one BB in a barrel full of aggies, with as many or more lefty pedo's as righty. This is a global leader paradox that goes well beyond Trump, regardless of his guilt or innocense. Always was. There's a reason the previous admin had every opportunity to disclose the files, and didn't get close to that keg. There's the fact that Trump may well not be in those files. There's the fact that he could be in those files. There's also the fact that when everyone else in those files is exposed, Trump will become a fine print footnote in the matter.
Click to expand...


Fine print footnote?

Sorry, no. If the sitting POTUS engaged in pedo activities that's WAAAAAAYYYYY more than a footnote.
 
#7,262
#7,262

New Evidence Shows Jeffrey Epstein Was a Horrible Person: He Dared to Doubt Climate Change!​


In amazingly dense fashion, we get a new report on Jeffrey Epstein that puts the man in a negative light. According to an Ivy League publication, it has been exposed that the late Democratic Party donor may have held positions that need to be reexamined, and could cast the man in an unacceptable position. You need to gird yourself for this revelation.

Jeffrey Epstein was apparently a climate denier.

This explosive information arrives from the Yale University publication Climate Connections. And to go along with this new information that casts Epstein now as a man of possibly distasteful character, the outlet also sees fit to include President Trump in this exposé. The connections are, to come up with a proper explanation, desperate.

redstate.com

New Evidence Shows Jeffrey Epstein Was a Horrible Person: He Dared to Doubt Climate Change!

New report uncovers Jeffrey Epstein's climate denial and ties to Trump amidst serious accusations.
redstate.com redstate.com
 
#7,263
#7,263
lawgator1 said:
Fine print footnote?

Sorry, no. If the sitting POTUS engaged in pedo activities that's WAAAAAAYYYYY more than a footnote.
Click to expand...
Compared to all the influential leaders and people in this world, past and present, including fomer sitting POTUS', he would easily fade into the fine print. Then again, you folks didn't mind at all that the previous sitting POTUS showered with his daughter at inappropriate age. If what you say is true, and if he is in the gang, then why did the Biden Admin sit on it??? It ain't hard to figure out:

1. Trump IS NOT in it, and everyone else is, and they would destroy themselves.
2. Trump IS in it, and so is everyone else in the Land of OZ, and they will still destroy themselves, so orange man is not worth the fallout of what cometh.
3. If this is strictly TDS and bringing Trump down, why did the same dems not demand the release from Biden. Why did they sit on it? Because someone, somewhere has seen the full unedited script and said, oh s**t, ya'll better find a way around this. So, what do we have now. A sitting POTUS that signed off on releasing the files, sent back to Congress, where it will never pass cause half of htem are in it and they know it. He gave them the big finger and said if you think you got me this time, go for it. He plays them in tune and out of tune. Good, bad, or indifferent, guilty or innocent, there is no one in that town with enough intelligence to get scotch tape to stick the the Teflon Don.
 
#7,266
#7,266
whodeycin85 said:
Is there any chance in your mind that anything against Biden or other Dem associated people was destroyed by the last admin
Click to expand...
Somewhere in this world there is an unedited copy in hiding. Political insurance is a real thing. The likely only possible reason Maxwell has not been clintoncided, and still breathes, is that there must be a notion that the known file has a back up. Cause we all know there's not enough integrity on The Hill to have not altered that file.
 
#7,267
#7,267
GVF said:
Somewhere in this world there is an unedited copy in hiding. Political insurance is a real thing. The likely only possible reason Maxwell has not been clintoncided, and still breathes, is that there must be a notion that the known file has a back up. Cause we all know there's not enough integrity on The Hill to have not altered that file.
Click to expand...
I think members of Congress have varied editions of it. Given what some of them are saying they've seen now. Much of a cluster fack
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and GVF
#7,268
#7,268
hog88 said:
I was lucky, all in we spent about $2500 on our wedding.
Click to expand...
even adding a zero wouldn't cover our costs.

the future MIL is very much trying to live vicariously thru her daughter to get the wedding my fiance she always wanted. My fiance doesn't want me to be the bad guy and tell her no on this stuff, but then she won't stand up to her.

we just went and got our wedding rings, the absolute cheapest we could have walked out of there was that 2500.
 
#7,269
#7,269
BernardKingGOAT said:
I think members of Congress have varied editions of it. Given what some of them are saying they've seen now. Much of a cluster fack
Click to expand...
Truth

I had a senior manager one time. In our plant, he was the plant manager, but other plant level mangers in town reported to him as well. We had some kind of meeting or phone conference we all sat in on. At the end, when it was just us in the conference room and everyone lese was gone or disconnected, he stood up, bent over resting his hands on the table, raised his head and said "Gentlemen...that was a cluster frack" and left the room. He was tough and sometimes brutal, but when my son was born, I got a free week of PTO as a gift. A practice of his from his days as tallest hog in the trough at those huge north carolina textile complexes.
 
#7,270
#7,270
LouderVol said:
even adding a zero wouldn't cover our costs.

the future MIL is very much trying to live vicariously thru her daughter to get the wedding my fiance she always wanted. My fiance doesn't want me to be the bad guy and tell her no on this stuff, but then she won't stand up to her.

we just went and got our wedding rings, the absolute cheapest we could have walked out of there was that 2500.
Click to expand...

Wow, sorry man. Sounds like you've got some serious MIL issues in front of you.
 
#7,271
#7,271
Franklin Pierce said:

New Evidence Shows Jeffrey Epstein Was a Horrible Person: He Dared to Doubt Climate Change!​


In amazingly dense fashion, we get a new report on Jeffrey Epstein that puts the man in a negative light. According to an Ivy League publication, it has been exposed that the late Democratic Party donor may have held positions that need to be reexamined, and could cast the man in an unacceptable position. You need to gird yourself for this revelation.

Jeffrey Epstein was apparently a climate denier.

This explosive information arrives from the Yale University publication Climate Connections. And to go along with this new information that casts Epstein now as a man of possibly distasteful character, the outlet also sees fit to include President Trump in this exposé. The connections are, to come up with a proper explanation, desperate.

redstate.com

New Evidence Shows Jeffrey Epstein Was a Horrible Person: He Dared to Doubt Climate Change!

New report uncovers Jeffrey Epstein's climate denial and ties to Trump amidst serious accusations.
redstate.com redstate.com
Click to expand...
I'm not defending anyone. Larry Summers is obviously a lowlife scumbag .... so is the representative from the Virgin Islands, Stacy Plaskett.

However, if you are going to go all the way back to the 1990's to play the guilt by association card with Harvard, then you are also putting this 2002 quote from Donald Trump into play :

"I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." - Donald Trump was quoted making these remarks in New York magazine in 2002.

Do you really think it's fair to go all the way back to the 90's? If so? Then that quote from Donald Trump is still relevant as well.
 
#7,272
#7,272
volfanhill said:
I'm of the opinion if there was enough to take people down it would have happened already.
Click to expand...
I agree the problem is both sides don't want that can of worms out. People knew on both sides and did nothing. Now the Democrats have hit rock bottom and nothing to lose so the issue is not a problem. Sad state of affairs.

Trump did mention the Epstein files on several stops but technically did not say he would release them except in interviews which depends on how a person interprets them. He has a way of denial as does his followers and his voters. He could not say I will make that decision after I see them.

Way to much discussion about this and the back & forth is a just dumb. They are coming out eventually because people will not let it go. Time to wait and see or move on. At this point all the Epstein files are just the kindling for the fire that is being stoked. Gasoline will come later by both sides.
 
#7,275
#7,275
LouderVol said:
even adding a zero wouldn't cover our costs.

the future MIL is very much trying to live vicariously thru her daughter to get the wedding my fiance she always wanted. My fiance doesn't want me to be the bad guy and tell her no on this stuff, but then she won't stand up to her.

we just went and got our wedding rings, the absolute cheapest we could have walked out of there was that 2500.
Click to expand...
Are her parents paying? If not then they can F off. I'm aware that's easier said than done
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top