volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 38,825
- Likes
- 72,947
You've already explained? lolI've already explained. The attempt was to paint him guilty by implying he spent "several hours with redacted." An assumed victim. Which is why the immediate reaction was that hey ass hats redacted already said Trump never did anything she was aware of. But congrats. Keeping being on the side of the pedo
Congrats on calling the rape victim a liar and siding with the pedo. This really isn't hard. There is no other time in your life where you would have done this. But....muh Trump has rotted your brain.You've already explained? lol
Well I've already explained that the trump response doesn't fit. If the e-mail was a lie.....you would think that would be the lead, but it wasn't.
Maybe the trump circle wanted the public to believe the lie because it better supported their position?
But congrats on unquestioningly excepting the trump line....no matter how incongruent with the other "facts".
www.glennbeck.com
So what is your narrative now?
![]()
Trump calls on House Republicans to vote to release Epstein files: 'We have nothing to hide'
President calls Epstein file controversy a 'Democrat hoax' while pushing GOP lawmakers to vote for full release of related documents and materials.www.foxnews.com

Still completely missing the point....so I'll bow out first.Congrats on calling the rape victim a liar and siding with the pedo. This really isn't hard. There is no other time in your life where you would have done this. But....muh Trump has rotted your brain.
My explanation makes perfect sense. And is evidenced by the posters on here's reaction. Only you cared about location. The rest went full on "proof he spent hours with a victim."
Of course you are the only person to call her a liar. Pretty gross.
What else do you think this human trafficked raped dead woman lied about? What else do you believe her rapist is more honest about than her? Please continue
Didn't the Republicans move to vote on it, and the Dems blocked it to delay?Again...every Democrat is calling for them to be released. The House vote to do is 100% Dems and the Trump led Republicans are fighting to not make it happen. There is no way to spin this, it's fact. And if you say that's not the case, you are not somone to be taken seriously because you are not arguing in good faith. You are simply ignoring reality.
If makes NO damn sense if releasing them vindicates him because that POS would have released them Day 1 if they vindicated him. And this mental gymnastics of "if something was in them the Dems would have released them"....not only does it ignore the facts of the case but it makes no damn sense because Trump can end all speculation and HE F'N CAMPGAINED ON IT, and all the Republican talking heads pushed it and shut up the moment Trump's name came up and he told them to stop talking about it.
Use your freakin' brain.
WASHINGTON — House Democrats prevented a quick vote on legislation that would require the Justice Department to release all its files on sex predator Jeffrey Epstein, apparently hoping to keep the controversy in the spotlight longer, the GOP has alleged.
Ahead of the House vote to end the 43-day government shutdown, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) took to the floor and requested unanimous consent to immediately vote on the Epstein bill.
The GOP attempt failed, with Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), the senior GOPer in charge of the House floor, explaining: “The chair is constrained not to entertain the request unless cleared by the bipartisan floor and committee leaderships.”
“I tried to get the Epstein files [bill] straight to the floor, cut out all of this nonsense and the Democrats blocked it, oddly enough,” Burchett grumbled after his effort failed. “This is politics. It has nothing to do with what’s right.”
“I have not seen many stories written yet about the fact we put the discharge petition up for unanimous consent on the floor tonight,” Johnson vented to reporters Wednesday.
“The Democrats objected to the unanimous consent. Nobody has written a story about that. That is stunning to me.”
'Hating someone is like drinking poison and hoping the other person dies.' Generally attributed to Buddha.lol....
Everyone should have known how much he was rightfully hated in 2016.
The reality is that the hatred from the left was a positive for many trumpers.
They loved trump because he was a middle finger to the left.
For anyone to act surprised at the level of hatred is simply laughable. It was crystal clear from the beginning.
As a lawyer can you tell me what laws or restrictions that the Biden admin was restricted by in releasing the Epstein files during his term? And then can you tell me if those restrictions have been lifted by the courts and doJ or if they still apply currently?After it became clear that they were going to be released anyway. Plus, he's suggesting a subtle hedge - "lawfully entitled.."
Sounds like not all of it will be released.
