Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#6,951
#6,951
OHvol40 said:
I was a registered Democrat until the DNC screwed Bernie over (and they basically haven’t held a legit primary since then, shocker), and I can’t relate to any of the things you prescribed to democrats. You may have an issue with democrat leadership, but that list of things you’re against are the extreme fringe of ideology on the left. So, as I said, maybe you should actually talk to some instead of making sweeping generalities based on the most extreme views.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but your hated of trump overrides that
 
#6,953
#6,953
OHvol40 said:
This is what I mean, you are regurgitating some tired old propaganda. Surprise, politicians are hypocrites… although Bernie advocating for the rich to “pay their fair share”, as he likes to say, wouldn’t really be hypocritical if it also applied to him, now would it? I dont think anyone is against being wealthy, people are against being wealthy AND subsidized by regular folks. Trickle-down economics has run its course. This country has thrived most, as a matter of fact, when the ultra wealthy shoulder their share of the tax burden. I dont think there is anything radical about that at all actually, but I digress.

FYI, I don’t think anyone harbors resentment over you doing your job, do you?
Click to expand...
They DO shoulder the vast majority of the tax burden. Cheeses man, how much is enough?
 
#6,955
#6,955
whodeycin85 said:
I never said Obama invited him. The whole argument is the fact that his staff who is working upon his authority would have had a copy of the guest list. Which the guest list clearly shows Epstein a convicted pedophile. High profile pedophile. And if his chief of staff did not bring it up to his attention then I can safely and logically assume that it was enough of a non-issue to have Epstein there that his invitation was not rescinded.
Click to expand...
It would have never made it to White House staff. Epstein would not have made it past the Secret Service background check. It's unlikely that one was ever conducted because Epstein never responded to the invite with an intention to attend .... presumably, because he knew that he couldn't as a registered sex offender.
 
#6,956
#6,956
BowlBrother85 said:
You are making some assumptions here ...... Epstein was forwarded the e-mail by a former associate of his named Lesley Groff. It's not clear whether the person who drafted the invite (Lisa Rossi of Dynamic SRG) intended for Epstein to receive it. Any way you look at it, there was no way that Epstein was ever going to make his way into the dinner.
Click to expand...
The email and invitation are for Epstien and no one else. If it wasn't intended to be sent out then why was it sent at all and drafted.
 
#6,957
#6,957
BowlBrother85 said:
It would have never made it to White House staff. Epstein would not have made it past the Secret Service background check. It's unlikely that one was ever conducted because Epstein never responded to the invite with an intention to attend .... presumably, because he knew that he couldn't as a registered sex offender.
Click to expand...
Again if you think the SS and POTUS staff aren't vetting a guest list prior to invites then we are good.
And we aren't talking about a hidden conviction, we are talking about a very high profile case and conviction.
 
#6,958
#6,958
whodeycin85 said:
I never said Obama invited him. The whole argument is the fact that his staff who is working upon his authority would have had a copy of the guest list. Which the guest list clearly shows Epstein a convicted pedophile. High profile pedophile. And if his chief of staff did not bring it up to his attention then I can safely and logically assume that it was enough of a non-issue to have Epstein there that his invitation was not rescinded.
Click to expand...
Sorry I misread one of your earlier posts
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#6,959
#6,959
whodeycin85 said:
Again if you think the SS and POTUS staff aren't vetting a guest list prior to invites then we are good.
And we aren't talking about a hidden conviction, we are talking about a very high profile case and conviction.
Click to expand...
Again ..... you don't even know if that e-mailed invitation was intended for Epstein. He was forwarded the e-mailed invitation by way of a former associate named Lesley Groff. The e-mail is not addressed to Jeffrey Epstein by the person who drafted it (Lisa Rossi of the political consulting firm Dynamic SRG).
 
#6,960
#6,960
BowlBrother85 said:
Again ..... you don't even know if that e-mailed invitation was intended for Epstein. He was forwarded the e-mailed invitation by way of a former associate named Lesley Groff. The e-mail is not addressed to Jeffrey Epstein by the person who drafted it (Lisa Rossi of the political consulting firm Dynamic SRG).
Click to expand...
My guess is the original email was sent to the consulting firming instructing them to reach out to big time donors. Epstein was on that list. Hence the email
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#6,961
#6,961
BowlBrother85 said:
Again ..... you don't even know if that e-mailed invitation was intended for Epstein. He was forwarded the e-mailed invitation by way of a former associate named Lesley Groff. The e-mail is not addressed to Jeffrey Epstein by the person who drafted it (Lisa Rossi of the political consulting firm Dynamic SRG).
Click to expand...
You do know that she was still working for epstein. There's no public information that she had stopped working for him prior to 2013. Which means she was still working in a capacity as an executive system for him unless you have proof of otherwise which you will not find. Which means that the email was intended for Jeffrey Epstein not his assistant. You've already said it's a bad look now you're just trying to do damage control for the great hope Obama
 
#6,964
#6,964
volfanhill said:
My guess is the original email was sent to the consulting firming instructing them to reach out to big time donors. Epstein was on that list. Hence the email
Click to expand...
I can see that .... or I can see Lesley Groff assuming something she received was intended for Epstein, when it was for someone else.

Whatever was the case, the gymnastics that @whodeycin85 has performed in trying to suggest that Barack Obama was cool with Jeffrey Epstein attending a Democratic Party fundraiser in 2013 .... would make Simone Biles proud.

It's exhibiting the same obsessive "derangement syndrome" of logic that they accuse Democrats of having for Trump .... and just like Trump, they can't admit when they are wrong and hypocrisy is always something the other side does.
 
#6,967
#6,967
whodeycin85 said:
You do know that she was still working for epstein. There's no public information that she had stopped working for him prior to 2013. Which means she was still working in a capacity as an executive system for him unless you have proof of otherwise which you will not find. Which means that the email was intended for Jeffrey Epstein not his assistant. You've already said it's a bad look now you're just trying to do damage control for the great hope Obama
Click to expand...
I've seen nothing that shows Obama needs damage control. LOL.
 
#6,973
#6,973
OHvol40 said:
I may be wrong, but you’re likely in the minority on that one. Nobody has brought justice for these victims (the only person in jail for this is a woman after all, and she’s being treated very well). So, the citizens demand transparency and justice.
Click to expand...
I wish the victims would halt the press conferences and spill all they know to the NYT, WaPo, or any other MSM entity. Lord knows they would run the story as they have no problem going with anonymous sources. They could treat the accusations just like what occurred in the #MeToo movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top