LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 59,228
- Likes
- 60,220
she sticks to the guns that gives her an out. while using legalese to avoid implicating herself.I get the feeling there is more, but she basically sticks to her guns. She even goes on to talk about one victim that she only meet after she was 20 (comes up about a 18th birthday card). To say there isn't some very bizarre things going on with this from top to bottom would be an understatement. I mean it looks like she was basically out of this in the early 2000s, she even claims no investigator even contacted her about all stuff from 2009.
My basic summary so far is, she lined up adult girls but she was mostly shielded from anything sexual for the most part, but doesn't exactly deny saying she never saw sex with Epstein. (its a little strange in the deposition at a few points) She claims she was basically out by early 2000s but did a few things for him later but not much. She was involved with the Clintons until 2018 at least, and Trump is mentioned in a positive light.
(I'm almost finished with her deposition, I'll try and read her trial transcript later in the week)
I didn't find any of what I read that compelling. maybe you have read something I didn't, idk. nothing she says makes a ton of sense as explaining the evidence in a different light or really explains anything.
like you pointed out, she claims she was out, but still doing stuff for Epstein. thats contradictory, and I think she is trying to use a very loose definition of "out" to try and remove herself from association while leaving some space to avoid perjury.


