Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

I get the feeling there is more, but she basically sticks to her guns. She even goes on to talk about one victim that she only meet after she was 20 (comes up about a 18th birthday card). To say there isn't some very bizarre things going on with this from top to bottom would be an understatement. I mean it looks like she was basically out of this in the early 2000s, she even claims no investigator even contacted her about all stuff from 2009.

My basic summary so far is, she lined up adult girls but she was mostly shielded from anything sexual for the most part, but doesn't exactly deny saying she never saw sex with Epstein. (its a little strange in the deposition at a few points) She claims she was basically out by early 2000s but did a few things for him later but not much. She was involved with the Clintons until 2018 at least, and Trump is mentioned in a positive light.

(I'm almost finished with her deposition, I'll try and read her trial transcript later in the week)
she sticks to the guns that gives her an out. while using legalese to avoid implicating herself.

I didn't find any of what I read that compelling. maybe you have read something I didn't, idk. nothing she says makes a ton of sense as explaining the evidence in a different light or really explains anything.

like you pointed out, she claims she was out, but still doing stuff for Epstein. thats contradictory, and I think she is trying to use a very loose definition of "out" to try and remove herself from association while leaving some space to avoid perjury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
I could care less how much they spend they are going to do it anyway and get rich while doing it. Then you should agree there is to many government employees and people who chose to live off the government.

Guess I’m a nutter. Can’t vote for a party who thinks you can kill a baby up to birth. Can’t vote for a party who thinks you can change sex. Cant vote for a party who thinks it’s ok to let all these illegals in so they can stay in power by messing with the census. That’s why the Democrats want all these illegals in the country
I think you need to stop listening to propaganda about democrats and actually talk to a few of them. You might be surprised about how much you agree on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
she sticks to the guns that gives her an out. while using legalese to avoid implicating herself.

I didn't find any of what I read that compelling. maybe you have read something I didn't, idk. nothing she says makes a ton of sense as explaining the evidence in a different light or really explains anything.

like you pointed out, she claims she was out, but still doing stuff for Epstein. thats contradictory, and I think she is trying to use a very loose definition of "out" to try and remove herself from association while leaving some space to avoid perjury.

I feel like she kind of explains it, but you have to remember its up to the interviewer to ask the questions to fill in the blanks. It would seem like in the early 2000s she basically stopped working for him, but might have still received payments. She did some things for him I think around 2009 but that was about it because he didn't trust anyone else. She was on the Island I think if I am reading that right around 2007 but she was working for him, and I think he gave her a lift back to the States.

Its a little wordy when it comes to some of the sex stuff, but she is basically sticking to her guns on anything that would be considered illegal.... she absolutely denies any involvement with minors but does admit she knew some of them.

(I just finished her deposition, I'll try and give the trial transcript a go over the next week)

I am of the opposite mindset, the more dirt she has on the elite - the better chance of getting out of prison which would have to be weight against the possibility of being eliminated.
 
Last edited:
I could care less how much they spend they are going to do it anyway and get rich while doing it. Then you should agree there is to many government employees and people who chose to live off the government.

Guess I’m a nutter. Can’t vote for a party who thinks you can kill a baby up to birth. Can’t vote for a party who thinks you can change sex. Cant vote for a party who thinks it’s ok to let all these illegals in so they can stay in power by messing with the census. That’s why the Democrats want all these illegals in the country
Gov Employees - Can always do more with less. But the Rush Limbaugh fueled evil gubmint employee ain't going to fix your problems.
People living of gubmint - Yeah, need to end that. All of that. No welfare. No military pensions. No pension protections.
Voting democrat is dumb. But abortion and trannys, whats the impact to you? You beat Abortion. Congrats!
 
LOL. Trump, Bondi, and the MAGA cult have been spinning Trump's blocking of release of these documents for 6 months !!
You seem disappointed they’re being released. Now what will you chirp about?

Was it a “MAGA” who spearheaded it in MTG? Really hurts the agenda for you.
 
Last edited:
I think you need to stop listening to propaganda about democrats and actually talk to a few of them. You might be surprised about how much you agree on.
What propaganda. I have heard it from Democrat leadership. I vote for a Democrat is a vote for some crazy stuff. There is no more Dixie-crats. You have Democrats on video saying one thing in the past but it’s the complete opposite now
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
I think you need to stop listening to propaganda about democrats and actually talk to a few of them. You might be surprised about how much you agree on.

I work with several and they vary from left to far left. My biggest gripe is the moderate ones are pussies. They have openly told me they only agree with some of the radical stances of their coworkers out of fear they will go after them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
You seem disappointed they’re being released. Now what we chirp about?

Was it a “MAGA” who spearheaded it in MTG? Really hurts agenda for you.

The resolution requires release of all "unclassified" materials. What unclassified materials, who decides that, is there a means for that assertion to be challenged, and if so is there a neutral arbiter of what is claimed by the Trump DOJ to be "classified"?
 
What propaganda. I have heard it from Democrat leadership. I vote for a Democrat is a vote for some crazy stuff. There is no more Dixie-crats. You have Democrats on video saying one thing in the past but it’s the complete opposite now
I was a registered Democrat until the DNC screwed Bernie over (and they basically haven’t held a legit primary since then, shocker), and I can’t relate to any of the things you prescribed to democrats. You may have an issue with democrat leadership, but that list of things you’re against are the extreme fringe of ideology on the left. So, as I said, maybe you should actually talk to some instead of making sweeping generalities based on the most extreme views.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
The resolution requires release of all "unclassified" materials. What unclassified materials, who decides that, is there a means for that assertion to be challenged, and if so is there a neutral arbiter of what is claimed by the Trump DOJ to be "classified"?

Previously released documents or information which were unclassified or deemed unclassified can be designated and changed to classified. (see EO 13526)

Not only is classified material classified, even unclassified material can be reclassified as classified.


WTF are you talking about? 🤣
 
The resolution requires release of all "unclassified" materials. What unclassified materials, who decides that, is there a means for that assertion to be challenged, and if so is there a neutral arbiter of what is claimed by the Trump DOJ to be "classified"?

Why would anything JE related be "classified"? UNLESS he was involved with one or more of our 3 letter agencies or a foreign government. FOI requests would discover that some documents are classified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and purp
I was a registered Democrat until the DNC screwed Bernie over (and they basically haven’t held a legit primary since then, shocker), and I can’t relate to any of the things you prescribed to democrats. You may have an issue with democrat leadership, but that list of things you’re against are the extreme fringe of ideology on the left. So, as I said, maybe you should actually talk to some instead of making sweeping generalities based on the most extreme views.
But a vote for a Democrat is a vote for the extreme view which is becoming the Democrat platform. So you like Bernie. So because someone is a billionaire they should have to give their money away right. I work for a company that makes 10 billion in profits almost every year. That’s what my job is. I’m supposed to make my employer money. It’s funny to hear Bernie talk about the rich when he has several homes and is a millionaire himself. It’s a fact that the rich pay the most in taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Why would anything JE related be "classified"? UNLESS he was involved with one or more of our 3 letter agencies or a foreign government. FOI requests would discover that some documents are classified.

He wants to have an argument with Trump about what is classified when under law its up to Trump to be head authority of classification. 🤣

Trump could make the Statute of Liberty legally disappear.

ef33eff3-51ea-4c40-8107-15eb1ef8059e_text.gif
 
But a vote for a Democrat is a vote for the extreme view which is becoming the Democrat platform. So you like Bernie. So because someone is a billionaire they should have to give their money away right. I work for a company that makes 10 billion in profits almost every year. That’s what my job is. I’m supposed to make my employer money. It’s funny to hear Bernie talk about the rich when he has several homes and is a millionaire himself. It’s a fact that the rich pay the most in taxes.
This is what I mean, you are regurgitating some tired old propaganda. Surprise, politicians are hypocrites… although Bernie advocating for the rich to “pay their fair share”, as he likes to say, wouldn’t really be hypocritical if it also applied to him, now would it? I dont think anyone is against being wealthy, people are against being wealthy AND subsidized by regular folks. Trickle-down economics has run its course. This country has thrived most, as a matter of fact, when the ultra wealthy shoulder their share of the tax burden. I dont think there is anything radical about that at all actually, but I digress.

FYI, I don’t think anyone harbors resentment over you doing your job, do you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
I work with several and they vary from left to far left. My biggest gripe is the moderate ones are pussies. They have openly told me they only agree with some of the radical stances of their coworkers out of fear they will go after them.
You just described two thirds of republicans who shamefully bent the knee to trump.
 
This is what I mean, you are regurgitating some tired old propaganda. Surprise, politicians are hypocrites… although Bernie advocating for the rich to “pay their fair share”, as he likes to say, wouldn’t really be hypocritical if it also applied to him, now would it? I dont think anyone is against being wealthy, people are against being wealthy AND subsidized by regular folks. Trickle-down economics has run its course. This country has thrived most, as a matter of fact, when the ultra wealthy shoulder their share of the tax burden. I dont think there is anything radical about that at all actually, but I digress.

FYI, I don’t think anyone harbors resentment over you doing your job, do you?

The wealthy shoulder way more than their "fair share" of the tax burden.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top