Tenn_Vol_Authority
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2007
- Messages
- 2,207
- Likes
- 0
Someway... somehow, God has to payback Gaffney for that "catch" in 2000. Even though the Pats lost, I'm not satisfied that Gaffney has been paid in full yet.
It was the correct call given the replay. If the DB wouldn't have pushed him out, he wouldn't have gotten both feet in.
Pointless at this stage, the Colts won.
In the 2001 game in Gainesville that we won 34-32 and Gaffney had a chance to catch the tying two point conversion, but had to give one of our DBs a piggy back ride through the endzone made me feel a little better about the "catch" in 2000.Someway... somehow, God has to payback Gaffney for that "catch" in 2000. Even though the Pats lost, I'm not satisfied that Gaffney has been paid in full yet.
They did eventually show him from earlier in the play running across the back of the endzone, in bounds the whole time, before eventually standing on the tips of his feet with his heels in the air before making the catch.It is pointless, but I thought his right foot was on the line before he went up. I don't think they ever discussed the right replay, though. The only angle in which you could really see was the first one they showed, I believe from the goal post cam from above shooting right down the line, and I don't think they ever showed it beginning before the catch. It was the only angle where you could see his heels before he went up.