rocky200663
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 813
- Likes
- 361
It was a tweet by gmann and was retweeted by UT Recruiting news so I don't know if it is accurate or not. The visit very well may have been cancelled and its false info. Just not sure.
Yea that's an old tweet, the visit has been cancelled and UT is not likely to recruit him at this point.
Their attention is gonna turn towards Owens and Cofer, and then if Suarez gets his release him.
The legend of the "vilified" Trae Golden has grown legs, but in reality, those who weren't sad to see him go mostly questioned his effort at times, his consistency, and his physical tools to play PG on both ends of the floor, mainly defense.
I'd take him back too, if he came back as a SG. As a PG, he wasn't quick enough offensively to break his man down, nor quick enough defensively to defend other PGs. He could get to the paint and finish with his floater due to his strength and he was solid at the FT line. Inconsistent outside jumper and awful defender. 12.5 ppg means very little if your man routinely outscores you on the other end. Opposing PGs set career highs in points on us far too often with Trae attempting to defend them.
If Thompson isn't returning, then I think you definitely take Chiles, as he's only a 1-year investment. Provides immediate depth at PG.
Agree completely. Like I've said all along with Chiles he's like Trae in that he is better suited at the 2, but I would gladly welcome trae on the team as a backup PG/SG.
Saw in another thread where Tyndall apparently stated that he's going to need a final decision from the players considering transferring soon. My guess would be it's directly related to this. Needs to know Thompson's decision so he knows whether to pull the trigger on Chiles or not.