IU VS BAMA

This is both true AND misleading.

They were 3* kids or NO stars out of HS. Then they produced in college and Indy brought them in from the portal. 50plus portal players. That's a different animal than recruiting 50 low rated kids from HS and turning them into world beaters

I don't know why folks keep harping on this - with a portal player, for the most part it is some other coach that has coached up the player, not the coaches with the teams they are playing for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheVolsFrog
A FG?????
It’s the right move. You needed 4 scores at that point either way.

FG takes you down to only needing 3 scores in the final quarter…which can actually be doable (even if it feels unlikely at this point).

You get nothing here and instead go into the fourth quarter needing 3 drives for TDs plus another drive for a FG or TD, that’s a hard uphill battle for a single quarter without also getting help from turnovers from the other team.
 
If lots of coaches were winning big with no name guys you might have an argument. Cignetti is the only guy winning at a high level with low level talent.

Most guys, including Alabama, are losing to him with much better talent.

I find it hard to see how that reflects on us. He's beating very, very good programs but he's the only guy in D1 doing this.
It’s not directly related to us. We are told to be happy with mediocre results because we haven’t given it enough time, but many coaches win a lot more than we have in that time. While Cignetti is extreme, he is the one on tv that I’m watching after what I watched our team do in year 5. I hope that makes sense.
 
It’s the right move. You needed 4 scores at that point either way.

FG takes you down to only needing 3 scores in the final quarter…which can actually be doable (even if it feels unlikely at this point).

You get nothing here and instead go into the fourth quarter needing 3 drives for TDs plus another drive for a FG or TD, that’s a hard uphill battle for a single quarter without also getting help from turnovers from the other team.
3 TD’s and three 2 point conversions is 24 points.
 
It’s the right move. You needed 4 scores at that point either way.

FG takes you down to only needing 3 scores in the final quarter…which can actually be doable (even if it feels unlikely at this point).

You get nothing here and instead go into the fourth quarter needing 3 drives for TDs plus another drive for a FG or TD, that’s a hard uphill battle for a single quarter without also getting help from turnovers from the other team.

No it was a 3 score game…technically…but I would like the odds from here of getting the ball back in the 3rd and then making it a two score game then making 3 2 pointers.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top