It's Pretty Simple...

#26
#26
With the righ read on that play, I believe it was Downs without a Tiger within 15 yards of him over the middle and UT is up 7-0 or has 1st and goal
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Someone needs to explain to Simms that TE's can catch passes too. He overlooked Downs and Rivera all day.
 
#27
#27
With the schedule we have this year I don't think anyone who knows anything about football expected us to go undefeated. 8-4 would be a great season but I still think we go 7-5 and beat SC. We lose to teams we probably should lose to and people want to fire everyone including the waterboy. geeeezzzz
 
#29
#29
With the righ read on that play, I believe it was Downs without a Tiger within 15 yards of him over the middle and UT is up 7-0 or has 1st and goal
Posted via VolNation Mobile

He was completely uncovered. I about vomited when I saw the replay of that. How in the world did Simms not see him?
 
#30
#30
We played well for a half. Their depth and talent took over from there. This is a game that we couldn't win at full strength much less with all of our best players hurt. Our effort in the first half was admirable. That's something to build on. Matt Simms isn't very good; that's nothing surprising. We'll have to tough out another week before we get another game that we'll have a chance in.

I watched most of the game and UT looked pretty tough in the first half, as you did against us. So your front line players are competitive, but the depth is not there. It'll take a couple of recruiting classes to fix that. I think you'll find out if DD can get the job done by his next two classes.
 
#31
#31
We let the Cincinnati game affect us way too much. This year is just like last year. A wash and closer to rebuilding.
 
#32
#32
We let the Cincinnati game affect us way too much. This year is just like last year. A wash and closer to rebuilding.

I agree. I just wish four of our best five players weren't out so we could see this team at full strength.
 
#33
#33
We let the Cincinnati game affect us way too much. This year is just like last year. A wash and closer to rebuilding.

I don't think we did. Look at the hand we're playing with now compared to the Cincy game. You saw an 8 or 9 win team that week. Now, we're left with a team that will be lucky to be 7-5.
 
#34
#34
I would classify the first 28 minutes of the game as fantastic defensive line play. They played better than I thought they could.

:) the reason for my edit from great to much improved is that I'm reserving the "great" quote for next week!!
 
#35
#35
We let the Cincinnati game affect us way too much. This year is just like last year. A wash and closer to rebuilding.

Disagree. The Cincy game just showed a hint of this teams potential. We didn't count on getting snakebit as bad as we have. Our oline, our dline, our special teams have all shown marked improvement.
 
#36
#36
I don't think we did. Look at the hand we're playing with now compared to the Cincy game. You saw an 8 or 9 win team that week. Now, we're left with a team that will be lucky to be 7-5.

It hurt. But I still see a team that's 3-3 or 4-2 anyways with everyone healthy.

The injuries have killed this team. I didn't realize how huge of a loss Justin Hunter was. I knew it was big, but our offense just isn't the same. We all know about Bray. Lathers is an SEC LB that's gone. And then JJ...dear God.

I knew we couldn't completely judge Dooley this year, but I thought we would have a little bit of sense of direction. And this year we can't. We are going to have to wait till 2012. This year just is a complete wash. Are there things to work on? Hell yeah. But it's quite simple you can't compete with the lack of depth from previous regimes AND injuries to your best players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#37
#37
I mean, I've never really thought that a single receiver could affect a team in such a profound way, but the loss of Hunter really just killed our momentum, and we haven't really recovered since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#38
#38
It hurt. But I still see a team that's 3-3 or 4-2 anyways with everyone healthy.

The injuries have killed this team. I didn't realize how huge of a loss Justin Hunter was. I knew it was big, but our offense just isn't the same. We all know about Bray. Lathers is an SEC LB that's gone. And then JJ...dear God.

I knew we couldn't completely judge Dooley this year, but I thought we would have a little bit of sense of direction. And this year we can't. We are going to have to wait till 2012. This year just is a complete wash. Are there things to work on? Hell yeah. But it's quite simple you can't compete with the lack of depth from previous regimes AND injuries to your best players.

I'd say 4-2 right now with him with a puncher's chance at 5-1. But, otherwise, I think your post is spot on.
 
#39
#39
I'd say 4-2 right now with him with a puncher's chance at 5-1. But, otherwise, I think your post is spot on.

What completely blows my mind (and made me smile a little today) was that the gameplan today was perfect. If we had the players, that's how you beat LSU. The defense (other than letting corners play 10 yards off on 3rd & short) was very good till about late third when Jefferson was fresh and the D was tired. The offense had opportunities, just couldn't convert. Which was weird because last week the gameplan was bad.

I guess this is my postgame thread, but as someone who doesn't ever go to UT games (my second one in my life today) it was really depressing to see the stadium at the end of the game, and I get why the fanbase is so depressed/mad, etc. It's been 13 years since we won an SEC title, and you are asking fans to be more patient, and I get why some don't want to hear that. I don't like to hear it. But it's the truth. It's hard for fans to hear "Look, I know we haven't won anything of importance since Clinton was in office, but...give us till 2013." Yet that's what it looks like before we get to title type talent. The defensive backs are bad, the linebacking depth is atrocious, we have one defensive tackle who can play on better SEC teams, our defensive ends can't put pressure on the QB, our running backs aren't good, the o-line is all sophomores and a junior, and four of the top five receivers are underclassmen. We don't have the depth and that's not going to be possible till 2013.

2011 is a wash as I said earlier. 2012 is where we need to see 8-9 wins, and 2013 is title time. The question is how the fanbase/athletic department react if we only win 6 games this year and then 7 next year. I think Dooley deserves four years. This place was a dump when he took over. He needs more than two or three to fix it.
 
#40
#40
I mean, I've never really thought that a single receiver could affect a team in such a profound way, but the loss of Hunter really just killed our momentum, and we haven't really recovered since.

On a team desperate for playmakers, that's what Hunter brought to the table. His absence affects the entire offense in a trickle-down manner.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#41
#41
What completely blows my mind (and made me smile a little today) was that the gameplan today was perfect. If we had the players, that's how you beat LSU. The defense (other than letting corners play 10 yards off on 3rd & short) was very good till about late third when Jefferson was fresh and the D was tired. The offense had opportunities, just couldn't convert. Which was weird because last week the gameplan was bad.

I guess this is my postgame thread, but as someone who doesn't ever go to UT games (my second one in my life today) it was really depressing to see the stadium at the end of the game, and I get why the fanbase is so depressed/mad, etc. It's been 13 years since we won an SEC title, and you are asking fans to be more patient, and I get why some don't want to hear that. I don't like to hear it. But it's the truth. It's hard for fans to hear "Look, I know we haven't won anything of importance since Clinton was in office, but...give us till 2013." Yet that's what it looks like before we get to title type talent. The defensive backs are bad, the linebacking depth is atrocious, we have one defensive tackle who can play on better SEC teams, our defensive ends can't put pressure on the QB, our running backs aren't good, the o-line is all sophomores and a junior, and four of the top five receivers are underclassmen. We don't have the depth and that's not going to be possible till 2013.

2011 is a wash as I said earlier. 2012 is where we need to see 8-9 wins, and 2013 is title time. The question is how the fanbase/athletic department react if we only win 6 games this year and then 7 next year. I think Dooley deserves four years. This place was a dump when he took over. He needs more than two or three to fix it.

Solid post. I think 2012 can be a really good year.
 
#42
#42
Solid post. I think 2012 can be a really good year.

I just don't see our defense being a championship defense by then. Our offense, if everyone is healthy, might be one of the best in Tennessee history.

We will win all our OOC games. I assume we'll play three west opponents (Bama, Arkansas, Miss State). I'll take 8-9 wins.
 
#43
#43
I just don't see our defense being a championship defense by then. Our offense, if everyone is healthy, might be one of the best in Tennessee history.

We will win all our OOC games. I assume we'll play three west opponents (Bama, Arkansas, Miss State). I'll take 8-9 wins.

We'll certainly be deeper, and I think we'll be better at LB. But, it remains to be seen how good they can be.
 
#44
#44
I just don't see our defense being a championship defense by then. Our offense, if everyone is healthy, might be one of the best in Tennessee history.

We will win all our OOC games. I assume we'll play three west opponents (Bama, Arkansas, Miss State). I'll take 8-9 wins.

Our D may not be of champ quality but the opposing D's will have major problems containing us. With a powerful offense and a strong D, we will be very much in the mix.
 
#45
#45
We played well for a half. Their depth and talent took over from there. This is a game that we couldn't win at full strength much less with all of our best players hurt. Our effort in the first half was admirable. That's something to build on. Matt Simms isn't very good; that's nothing surprising. We'll have to tough out another week before we get another game that we'll have a chance in.

I agree that we played well for the first half.. I was proud of their fight in the first half.. hard to hang with that strength and speed
 
#47
#47
I watched most of the game and UT looked pretty tough in the first half, as you did against us. So your front line players are competitive, but the depth is not there. It'll take a couple of recruiting classes to fix that. I think you'll find out if DD can get the job done by his next two classes.

OLine was entirely different. They play like that against you, we win.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#48
#48
Kidding???
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I just didn't remember D. Rogers showing up except for that one catch agains the Honey Bear but now that I have seen the stats I realize he accounted for 50% of Simms' completions.:boredom:
 

VN Store



Back
Top