TRUEFANVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2022
- Messages
- 538
- Likes
- 163
Yeah, I agree the Vince Foster death seemingly needed more investigation. If in fact it was a suicide, it could be said Linda Tripp's shenanigans were a stimulus to it.I wouldn’t say that too many deaths like Vince Foster to be coincidence. Nothing in Washington is coincidence.
You implied they were both low character, but bc they testified under oath, that they weren't as low as trump. That's how I took the post.How in the hell did you come up with that stupidness projection. I only stated the fact the Clintons testified and Trump won't. I didn't insinuate the detail you're projecting. Easy
jWe have gone from meeting in private leaks in the Oval office to Schedule leaks.Here’s a link about his schedule being leaked and the article even references other leaks because they were quite frequent. I’m not going to go searching to post others. They aren’t hard to find though as it was not a one time thing. You seem to either have selective memory or not think it’s a big deal.
Leak of President Trump's schedules a 'disgraceful breach of trust': White House
Above the law.Stephen Colbert 'Late Show' staffers Lied about having credentials before arrest, US Capitol Police chief says
The ‘Colbert 9’ were arrested in an unauthorized area of a U.S. Capitol building in June
A production crew associated with "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" lied to authorities about being "credentialed staff" before their arrest in a House office building last month.
In a Tuesday letter to Republican Reps. Rodney Davis of Illinois and Jim Jordan of Ohio, U.S. Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger broke down the arrests, explaining how an aide from Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., called the police after hearing someone shouting at their office and banging on the door of Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo.
Stephen Colbert 'Late Show' staffers lied about having credentials before arrest, US Capitol Police chief says
These stupid MFers don’t know how the government works.Is this commission gonna look into the insurrection at SCOTUS today? I mean, 17 members of Congress actively trying to overthrow the SCOTUS. Something must be done...
Judges have an inherent "gatekeeping" function to make sure a defense has support under law. The bar is low so generally defenses are allowed to be presented. A defense can't be put forward that isn't supported by the law and facts. If he wants to raise a defense that isn't enumerated under law, for instance, the judge's role is to forbid it.Steve Bannon is entering his criminal-contempt-of-Congress trial on Monday virtually defenseless — and already eyeing an appeal of a guilty verdict
I don’t really care about Bannon one way or the other, but what I’m really curious about is how a judge can basically throw out potential defenses before a trial. Bannon was going to argue that he skipped the congressional hearing based on advice from his lawyer, and the judge won’t allow that argument or many other potential defense arguments. How is this legal or impartial?
It was the first thing I saw and, as I stated, the article references the other leaks. If you want to go look up other ones then have at it, by all means. They happened frequently. I never said anything about the OO though, I just said private meetings. Hell, there was even the one thing that was big news for a whole about something Trump said on a cell phone in a restaurant. The depth and breadth of stupidity Dems constantly display regarding Trump is a sight to behold. It was a constant barrage of mostly lies to try and taint Trump. If evidently worked though.jWe have gone from meeting in private leaks in the Oval office to Schedule leaks.
Digging up bones.
The Schedule Leaks are a problem with the Staff and Meadows as Chief of Staff.
I can say with high probably that whoever leaked the President's schedule was fired or moved. This was an internal matter and should never have been made public.
You do realize you claim you don’t chase unsubstantiated opinions and then follow that up with your own, correct?To all the above responses, Trump is Unfit.
Whatever you want to call him or whatever you want to call our democracy or the structure of it.
Trump is Unfit and I don't need to prove it because he does it himself.
I wish I could prescribe Xanax because some of you need it. Time to take a Chill pill.
This is going to go the way it is going to go. Nothing you can do to stop the process.
It would be easy to take some of the Arguments apart in the above statements, but not worth the time or board space to do so. It is tangent and in some cases spewed rubbish which is totally opinionated and cannot be proven. Speculative at best but will never be validated. I don't chase unsubstantiated opinions.
It is simple to point the finger at one side or the other, but the fact remains the same. The Common Denominator causing all this Chaos and Confusion is Trump.
A lot of Spin in this Room, Way too much and I am not chasing rabbits down a hole. It is what it is.
Unfit. Fail. Not qualified. Mental. Self Centered.
Trump does a good job of Tainting himself...It was the first thing I saw and, as I stated, the article references the other leaks. If you want to go look up other ones then have at it, by all means. They happened frequently. I never said anything about the OO though, I just said private meetings. Hell, there was even the one thing that was big news for a whole about something Trump said on a cell phone in a restaurant. The depth and breadth of stupidity Dems constantly display regarding Trump is a sight to behold. It was a constant barrage of mostly lies to try and taint Trump. If evidently worked though.
Time will tell, I am willing to wait, are you? Who cares what happens if all the facts come out. Glad to see I am on your reading list.. I have also managed to keep my Mid Sentence Caps down just for you.You do realize you claim you don’t chase unsubstantiated opinions and then follow that up with your own, correct?
There wouldn’t be an investigation if there were nobody to investigate. Do you think it’s ok for a criminal to sit on the jury for their own trial? This logic is hilarious.Maybe the simple answer is you trust this committee way more than you should.
Pelosi got to choose the democrats on the committee. She can't choose the Republicans for them. Plain and simple.
To the argument maybe Jim Jordan was a "witness". That is BS. He is only a "witness" if you already have a perceived outcome. How are there no democrat "witnesses" to cross examine like lying Schiff if that is the BS reason. She wanted a controlled circus that's why. It's also why that fool will be not holding the gavel come January.