Is Jordan at 1st team RB a surprise?

#51
#51
I'm pretty sure I told ya'll last year after fall camp that he was better than Ty Chandler.

@KBVol tried to get on me for that through the season when Chandler got more playing time under the old staff.

Looks like I've been proven right once again.

I've always liked Jordan and the last thing he needs is you turning posters against him by making him a pawn in one of your narcissistic rants.

Ty is electric and it will be 'committee' running backs. Hence the "OR" . Jordan may be the bruiser, tough yards back and TC the the big yard specialist.
 
#52
#52
Jordan is the more powerful down hill runner. Sub him out and put Chandler in, the quickness could pay dividends. For example, look at the Titans running backs. Derrick Henry to Dion Lewis is a big change in speed.

Tim Jordan also has speed. He's simply a better overall RB than Ty Chandler.

To me they are similar to Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams on those early 2000s Auburn teams.

Both are great runners. Tim Jordan is just the better overall player cause he can do everything Ty Chandler can do and then some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockytop989
#53
#53
I've always liked Jordan and the last thing he needs is you turning posters against him by making him a pawn in one of your narcissistic rants.

Ty is electric and it will be 'committee' running backs. Hence the "OR" . Jordan may be the bruiser, tough yards back and TC the the big yard specialist.

I simply say what I believe.

I'm not here to placate others sensibilities.

If they wanna now hate on Tim Jordan cause I called his greatness before his first game as a true freshmen last year. Then so be it. I could care less. That sort of silliness is on them. Not me.
 
#54
#54
I simply say what I believe.

I'm not here to placate others sensibilities.

If they wanna now hate on Tim Jordan cause I called his greatness before his first game as a true freshmen last year. Then so be it. I could care less. That sort of silliness is on them. Not me.
Nah, it's you.

And there was several of us hyping him in his FF commitment thread. Looks like you jumped on board late my friend. Pay attention next time. :cool:
 
#55
#55
Ty is the RB that makes the most impact. Ty has shown he can play in the SEC, if you want to deviate from this the so be it but Ty C , is a hoss and doubt him if you will but this man is on a mission. Hate to say this but when a coach is as high on a kid (who unlike these armchairs don't know how to evaluate talent) then good things happen.

View attachment 165102
 
#56
#56
Tim Jordan also has speed. He's simply a better overall RB than Ty Chandler.

To me they are similar to Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams on those early 2000s Auburn teams.

Both are great runners. Tim Jordan is just the better overall player cause he can do everything Ty Chandler can do and then some.
Huh?
 
#57
#57
Tim Jordan also has speed. He's simply a better overall RB than Ty Chandler.

To me they are similar to Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams on those early 2000s Auburn teams.

Both are great runners. Tim Jordan is just the better overall player cause he can do everything Ty Chandler can do and then some.
Which one are you comparing to Cadillac. Although both were great, I always felt Cadillac was the better RB of those two.
 
#58
#58
Which one are you comparing to Cadillac. Although both were great, I always felt Cadillac was the better RB of those two.

Ty Chandler is Cadillac. And although Cadillac had more success in college, Ronnie Brown went higher than him in the draft.

I always felt Ronnie Brown was better. Cadillac just had more college success cause defenders in college are smaller. Remember Cadillac got hurt pretty quickly in the NFL because of his slight build.

Similarly, I doubt Ty Chandler has much success in the NFL because of his wiry build.
 
#59
#59
Ty Chandler is Cadillac. And although Cadillac had more success in college, Ronnie Brown went higher than him in the draft.

I always felt Ronnie Brown was better. Cadillac just had more college success cause defenders in college are smaller. Remember Cadillac got hurt pretty quickly in the NFL because of his slight build.

Similarly, I doubt Ty Chandler has much success in the NFL because of his wiry build.

...but isn't your point that Tim Jordan is the bigger, more physical back...wouldn't that make him Cadillac? Your comparisons...oi vey.
 
#62
#62
Glad UT has 3 they think they can rely on. They are all going to play and have significant roles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Remy
#64
#64
Ty Chandler is Cadillac. And although Cadillac had more success in college, Ronnie Brown went higher than him in the draft.

I always felt Ronnie Brown was better. Cadillac just had more college success cause defenders in college are smaller. Remember Cadillac got hurt pretty quickly in the NFL because of his slight build.

Similarly, I doubt Ty Chandler has much success in the NFL because of his wiry build.

You do realize we're talking about TN football, Vols not Titans. This means nobody gives a half gram of feces about your NFL projections. If we aren't discussing what they'll do wearing orange take it to the correct forum, which isn't this one.
 
#66
#66
Chandler does not have the mass to pound up the middle. I’m sure Helton will get him the ball, but you’ve got to have some girth.
In my opinion the best running back in the history of college football was Tony Dorsett. He never weighed more than a hundred and ninety-five pounds even into the pros
 
#69
#69
Ty is the RB that makes the most impact. Ty has shown he can play in the SEC, if you want to deviate from this the so be it but Ty C , is a hoss and doubt him if you will but this man is on a mission. Hate to say this but when a coach is as high on a kid (who unlike these armchairs don't know how to evaluate talent) then good things happen.

You write well for someone with a third grade education.
 
#70
#70
In my opinion the best running back in the history of college football was Tony Dorsett. He never weighed more than a hundred and ninety-five pounds even into the pros

Well, it might be just a skosh unfair to Chandler to make that comparison but to your point yes, one doesn't have to be terribly big to be very successful. Charles White and Archie Griffin weren't big guys either.
 
#71
#71
In my opinion the best running back in the history of college football was Tony Dorsett. He never weighed more than a hundred and ninety-five pounds even into the pros
OL averaged around 250 at the time too. Players are bigger, stronger, and faster now.
 
#72
#72
Ty Chandler is Cadillac. And although Cadillac had more success in college, Ronnie Brown went higher than him in the draft.

I always felt Ronnie Brown was better. Cadillac just had more college success cause defenders in college are smaller. Remember Cadillac got hurt pretty quickly in the NFL because of his slight build.

Similarly, I doubt Ty Chandler has much success in the NFL because of his wiry build.

I agree that as whole , Ronnie Brown was better than Cadillac. Comparing our RBs to them is a bit of a stretch.
 
#73
#73
OL averaged around 250 at the time too. Players are bigger, stronger, and faster now.
That might be the reason that the game has evolved away from the running game in general as the major offensive weapon. Merely making the package that you throw at the wall bigger does not mean the package will be more durable it will just make a bigger mess.
 
#74
#74
I'm pretty sure I told ya'll last year after fall camp that he was better than Ty Chandler.

@KBVol tried to get on me for that through the season when Chandler got more playing time under the old staff.

Looks like I've been proven right once again.

Pretty sure you have substituted the word “then” for “or”
 
Advertisement



Back
Top