- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 95,218
- Likes
- 68,284
Your definition of "spam" and my definition are very different.
The rest of your post is incoherent gibberish. The FACT is a conservative Republican manager at the IRS was FULLY aware of the proposal to use this screening process.
He AUTHORIZED its use.
He, HIMSELF, used it.
The reason given by the IRS for it is that there had been this big influx of new applications, and they were trying to figure out how to screen them so as to distinguish between political operations, and social ones.
No amount of claiming I'm dodging things, or complaining about Lerner, or open speculation that some mysterious "others" were involved changes these very simple, straightforward, FACTS.
If you think I'm banning or trolling, by explaining these things, then either you, or me, does not belong here. (Hint, it would be you.)
This actually solidifies your claim that there is infighting in the GOP between establishment and TP. You should be happy except it would invalidate your excuse that everything was kosher because a republican is involved. Which argument is more important to you? :question:
You explain nothing on here. You simply post weak article after weak article claiming the downfall of the GOP is imminent yet the results show that to be false.
You don't explain much of anything on here. You're simply left around to balance out the picture pages brigade