IRS admits to targeting Conservative groups

#1,701
#1,701
lawgator1 said:
Now you are making up facts and mischaracterizing others. First, there are 90,000 employees at the IRS. Six computers crashed. Second, your characterization of this as involving "unique data critical to an inquiry" is about the biggest overstatement I've read here, and that is saying a lot. When the story broke, even the hard right bloggers named only one person, a secretary. No one has claimed these other folks had "critical" information.

So, as usual, we see use by the far right on this topic of rhetorical false equivalencies, hyperbole, speculation and supposition, and leaps of logic claiming things are fact, when they are wannabe guesses, and poor ones at that.
Click to expand...

Why didn't they turn over the Grassley email?
 
#1,702
#1,702
lawgator1 said:
So, as usual, we see use by the far right on this topic of rhetorical false equivalencies, hyperbole, speculation and supposition, and leaps of logic claiming things are fact, when they are wannabe guesses, and poor ones at that.
Click to expand...

And you are claiming the opposite side as fact and that there is nothing wrong...

You keep using leaps of logic claiming things are fact, when they are wannabe guesses (or the forced fed fodder you easily like to eat), and poor ones at that....as the story is still developing and your knowledge of what happened is as good as any other person on here, and you do not know what happened but steadfastly deny any chance of scandal or cover up.

Your blind obedience and unwillingness to accept that the probability of this being true is greater than not, and your constant party nanny nanny boo boo shows you to be the shill you are.

But, what can we expect from a lawyer who always, and I mean always, is on here, day or night, weekday or weekend. No wonder you don't make a lot of money, and no wonder your social life is tied to the existence off this site, whether on it or on a golf course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,705
#1,705
I get confused, so someone please remind me. Is this the thread where lg believes it is wrong to speculate about someone's guilt/innocence w/o all the facts? Forgive me, it gets complicated.
 
#1,706
#1,706
lawgator1 said:
I agree with this.

And one naturally asks the question, why haven't they?? .
Click to expand...

They have no power to compel anyone to testify since the AG will not indict for contempt of congress. So why call anyone who can refuse or bosses refuse to let them?
 
#1,707
#1,707
hog88 said:
They have no power to compel anyone to testify since the AG will not indict for contempt of congress. So why call anyone who can refuse or bosses refuse to let them?
Click to expand...

Seems like they could at least have one of IT guys on staff for congress to help them understand how this stuff works.
 
#1,715
#1,715
hog88 said:
He couldn't, he will be out of office before the AG would ever indict.
Click to expand...

The AG will be out of office when Obama is. If a GOP wins the WH the new AG may pursue, however we have a history of the new administration protecting the last.
 
#1,717
#1,717
Gramps said:
The AG will be out of office when Obama is. If a GOP wins the WH the new AG may pursue, however we have a history of the new administration protecting the last.
Click to expand...

Except that Holder reopen cases against CIA operatives involved in enhanced interrogation even though they had twice been cleared IIRC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,718
#1,718
I don't want to see this thread die, so:

IRS_Weird_Tax_Trick.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,719
#1,719
Judge Sets Hearing on Group's Push to Investigate Lost IRS Emails - WSJ

A federal judge scheduled a hearing for next week on a grass-roots conservative group's request to investigate missing emails at the Internal Revenue Service, as part of the group's lawsuit against the agency.

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton ordered the hearing on Tuesday, after conservative group True the Vote filed a motion seeking to speed up discovery and "preserve and prevent further destruction" of documents and electronic data. Among other things, the group wants a forensic expert to figure out how the emails were lost and examine whether any of the missing data can be recovered.

The hearing is set for July 11 in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,721
#1,721
37L1 said:
Judge Sets Hearing on Group's Push to Investigate Lost IRS Emails - WSJ

A federal judge scheduled a hearing for next week on a grass-roots conservative group's request to investigate missing emails at the Internal Revenue Service, as part of the group's lawsuit against the agency.

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton ordered the hearing on Tuesday, after conservative group True the Vote filed a motion seeking to speed up discovery and "preserve and prevent further destruction" of documents and electronic data. Among other things, the group wants a forensic expert to figure out how the emails were lost and examine whether any of the missing data can be recovered.

The hearing is set for July 11 in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
Click to expand...



I don't mind at all if a court appointed neutral forensic expert gets involved and reviews it. I don't think some hack with an agenda does anyone any good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top