Iran

#23,576
#23,576
LouderVol said:
not that I expect it at all, but I would be interested to see your friends response to these issues. would also be interested in where his view point comes from, if he is selling something its going to push his view certain ways.
Click to expand...
I can't really expound on much more, but i will assure you that he/she doesn't have an agenda. I can't say anything that would be compromising.

My understanding is that the combination of extremely unstable leadership hell bent on killing infidels and progress towards nuclear capability and ICBM development is the driving factor.
 
#23,577
#23,577
"The Trump administration wants automakers and other American manufacturers to play a larger role in weapons production, reminiscent of a practice used during World War II.

Senior defense officials have held talks about producing weapons and other military supplies with the top executives of several companies, including Mary Barra of General Motors and Jim Farley of Ford Motor, according to people familiar with the discussions.

The Pentagon is interested in enlisting the companies to use their personnel and factory capacity to increase production of munitions and other equipment as the wars in Ukraine and Iran deplete stocks."


 
#23,578
#23,578
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ETV and StarRaider
#23,579
#23,579
kiddiedoc said:
I can't really expound on much more, but i will assure you that he/she doesn't have an agenda. I can't say anything that would be compromising.

My understanding is that the combination of extremely unstable leadership hell bent on killing infidels and progress towards nuclear capability and ICBM development is the driving factor.
Click to expand...
Hell bent on killing infidels? How’s that? Their ties with Russia and China indicate otherwise. Is your friend John Bolton?
 
#23,581
#23,581
kiddiedoc said:
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...
You just sound like a Trump boot licker.... is that how it goes libs? Yeah, the establishment is fine with Iran getting nukes. The establishment is only concerned about taking power from their citizens. Trump is changing it and the globalist hated
 
#23,582
#23,582
volfanhill said:
"The Trump administration wants automakers and other American manufacturers to play a larger role in weapons production, reminiscent of a practice used during World War II.

Senior defense officials have held talks about producing weapons and other military supplies with the top executives of several companies, including Mary Barra of General Motors and Jim Farley of Ford Motor, according to people familiar with the discussions.

The Pentagon is interested in enlisting the companies to use their personnel and factory capacity to increase production of munitions and other equipment as the wars in Ukraine and Iran deplete stocks."


Click to expand...
I'm for it. I'd love to buy a tank right off the Airport Motor Mile in Alcoa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#23,585
#23,585
kiddiedoc said:
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...
 
#23,588
#23,588
rikberry31 said:
Israel didn’t attack Iran first and then we hopped in after. This was well coordinated attack that had been planned for years. You’re either stupid or lying. Give up the crap that there was no plan and Trump is stupid. If you can’t see a definite strategy going all the way back to Panama you are a fool.
We now are in control o China’s oil. I guess there will be no more talk of then going after Taiwan in ‘27. We are China’s daddy now. New world order.
Click to expand...
😆

Better work on that Reading Comprehension 101.
 
#23,589
#23,589
kiddiedoc said:
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...

The nuclear threat is so overblown. Yeah, they are not that far from 90% enriched uranium, but making that into a weapon you could successfully deliver to the US is a whole different proposition...and if we don't wanna get nuked we should probably just stop ****ing with Iran, call me crazy....and if our allies don't wanna get nuked, then they should stop committing war crimes, FFS.

History has shown us mutually assured destruction is a mechanism that works. If Iran had a nuke, we would have never attacked them and started this cluster****. It would have saved us from our stupidity. We pulled out of a deal and created this situation. They want a nuke specifically because Israel and the US cannot be trusted. Most humiliating foreign policy blunder of my lifetime.

This is not America first, this is Israel's expansion first. We create our own problems and then quadruple down
 
#23,599
#23,599
kiddiedoc said:
With all due respect, that is crazy. The leadership of Iran is of the belief that killing Americans and other "infidels/Crusaders" is a "holy" pursuit. It's a tenet of Islamic extremism.
Click to expand...

Can you back this up? Which Iranian leaders said it's a holy pursuit to kill Americans?

I see Iranian leaders make threats against regimes that threaten them, yes. Kinda expect that, tho.

Bro, Hezbollah was created because Israel invaded Lebanon. Hamas was created because Israel illegally siezed Gaza. The growth of radical Islamic terrorism is a direct response to Israel and US foreign policy. It's not a response to our beliefs being different.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top