Iran

#17,182
#17,182
NashVol11 said:
The identity of the person asking the question has nothing to do with the answer, but you know that
Click to expand...
Sure it does. If someone is going to platform Nick Fuentes without challenging him on what he says, I don't expect him challenge the motives of biases of whomever is bashing Israel.
NashVol11 said:
Lol at doing the skeptical act only to blindly parrot admin propaganda
Click to expand...
Lol right back at you.

You think I should automatically give this guy credibility because he had a job title and purported access to information? In an administration where I have been repeatedly told unqualified people gain titles by anything other than merit?

Are you now giving credibility to people based on titles and purported access to information? If so, I can't wait to hear your "blind parroting of admin propaganda" from PRESIDENT Trump, ATTORNEY GENERAL Bondi, FBI DIRECTOR Patel, and the like. Since, you know, questioning people with titles is no longer a thing to do, and you can't get much more titled that those folks.

As for me, I will remain a critical thinker, thanks for playing.

Lol, Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAD
#17,183
#17,183
Ritzwatch said:
Sure it does. If someone is going to platform Nick Fuentes without challenging him on what he says, I don't expect him challenge the motives of biases of whomever is bashing Israel.
Click to expand...
That exchange had nothing to do with Israel. It was a question about the intel he had seen, which could have come from any reporter at any network.
Ritzwatch said:
Lol right back at you.

You think I should automatically give this guy credibility because he had a job title and purported access to information? In an administration where I have been repeatedly told unqualified people gain titles by anything other than merit?

Are you now giving credibility to people based on titles and purported access to information? If so, I can't wait to hear your "blind parroting of admin propaganda" from PRESIDENT Trump, ATTORNEY GENERAL Bondi, FBI DIRECTOR Patel, and the like. Since, you know, questioning people with titles is no longer a thing to do, and you can't get much more titled that those folks.

As for me, I will remain a critical thinker, thanks for playing.

Lol, Lol.
Click to expand...
I don't care whether you give him credibility or not, but "Tucker Carlson asked the (very generic) question" is a bad reason to discredit it. You should consider taking the same skeptical approach to the smear campaign that immediately followed his resignation rather than uncritically repeating it
 
#17,185
#17,185
Ritzwatch said:
Sure it does. If someone is going to platform Nick Fuentes without challenging him on what he says, I don't expect him challenge the motives of biases of whomever is bashing Israel.

Lol right back at you.

You think I should automatically give this guy credibility because he had a job title and purported access to information? In an administration where I have been repeatedly told unqualified people gain titles by anything other than merit?

Are you now giving credibility to people based on titles and purported access to information? If so, I can't wait to hear your "blind parroting of admin propaganda" from PRESIDENT Trump, ATTORNEY GENERAL Bondi, FBI DIRECTOR Patel, and the like. Since, you know, questioning people with titles is no longer a thing to do, and you can't get much more titled that those folks.

As for me, I will remain a critical thinker, thanks for playing.

Lol, Lol.
Click to expand...
IMG_1819.gif
 
#17,186
#17,186
lawgator1 said:
Dow is down close to 10 percent since this started.
Click to expand...
Mr. Gator, 1% of American’s own over 50% of the stock market.

30% of American’s don’t even have $1,000 in savings.

Like Pammi B, and her DOW obsession; I think the 10% drop is irrelevant to most. Gas is up $1.30 and soon that will be affecting the cost of everything else.
 
#17,187
#17,187
utvolpj said:
Iran didn't have a nuke and couldn't threaten the US even if they did. Once heard a guy state that the only reason they'd go to eat is because the man in charge was a terrible negotiator. Turns out he was right
Click to expand...
First they were really working on it and they told us that they had enough weapons grade fissionable material to make 10+ weapons. If don't think it isn't important that Iran never gets nuclear weapons you are a fool. And If you don't think that would be a major threat to the U.S. you are also foolish. They would use it on Israel about three seconds after they were capable. We have assets all over world and a ton that Iran already has the missile technology to reach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAD
#17,194
#17,194
allstar34 said:
Mr. Gator, 1% of American’s own over 50% of the stock market.

30% of American’s don’t even have $1,000 in savings.

Like Pammi B, and her DOW obsession; I think the 10% drop is irrelevant to most. Gas is up $1.30 and soon that will be affecting the cost of everything else.
Click to expand...

I think Trump pays attention to such things. I do, about five years to retirement.
 
#17,196
#17,196
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top