Smokey123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 18,177
- Likes
- 42,028
It's truly a disease. Some need to be it a padded cell wearing a straight jacket on anti-psyc meds.They even indicted him repeatedly on BS charges and raided his home...digging through his wife's underwear drawer. Yet they weren't gonna break out the Epstein evidence which would have disgraced him forever and ended his political career immediately. In a time when the Dems had the lowest approval rating ever in polling history. 23% approval. Yet they ignored "files" or evidence that could have been a nuclear bomb on Trump AND the Repubs.
^^^ there are at least a half dozen people here that believe this incredible BS. Their TDS is completely out of control. Trump is a blowhard and not a great guy. Theres no way in Hell there is any evidence he was molesting kids with Epstein or it would have run on EVERY news outlet on Earth 24/7 for months on end. When your party makes up 47 fictional genders and says men can give birth, divorcing yourself from reality and living in delusion apparently becomes a natural habit.
One cannot build a nuclear bomb with 60% enriched uranium. Period. As such, Iran did not have the ability to build 11 bombs, as you've claimed.@MontyPython. I'll except your apology and you can admit you were wrong. And go ahead discredit it like a good little democrat. Ah, I meam independent.![]()
Trump definitely has some worrisome ideas like the government taking stakes in private companies, limiting companies from buying private property, and bullying companies into moving their production. I understand what he is trying to do, but don’t like where that may take us in the future.Not sure what any of that has to with the FACTS that he has endorsed numerous socialist proposals originally proposed by Pocohontas and the Squad...
That is just "Witkoff said" again@MontyPython. I'll except your apology and you can admit you were wrong. And go ahead discredit it like a good little democrat. Ah, I meam independent.![]()
Right on que with the democratic talking points. I predicted that.One cannot build a nuclear bomb with 60% enriched uranium. Period. As such, Iran did not have the ability to build 11 bombs, as you've claimed.
You might want to actually read the article you've cited. Here's what it says:
"According to the IAEA, Iran maintains a stockpile of 972 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%."
Plus the article cited says nothing about Iran "admitting" it has weapons grade uranium.
Thus, you're still wrong.
Maybe check the Onion or perhaps another parody site for your scoops? Keep on digging!
Trolls the left and manipulates the right. Who knew all you needed was a democrat to run as a republican to get the right to openly support big spending and government overreach?Anyone that puts much stock in what Trump says in matters like that probably has TDS. He trolls the left so bad.
Can you not read the conversation you participated in? And it's "cue"Right on que. Exactly why I didn't post it in the first place. If MSNBC didn't say it, it's not valid.![]()
Witkoff said they had enriched uranium for bombs, not them. Out government has proven to be liars more often than honest. Iranian threats historically have been aimed at Israel, not us... we've openly given them cause to hate us via our relationship with Israel.
That is 100% untrue. They admitted in the meetings they had enough for 11 nukes . They said there was nothing we could do about it.
