Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 54,676
- Likes
- 54,993
Was this the story referenced? UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichmentI thought someone shared something this week...maybe yesterday...which showed the IAEA wasn't as absolute in their position of "no evidence"?
Understood. I am not challenging your post. Just looking for clarity.I’d have to see it. From everything I’ve read the IAEA has maintained they were not pursuing nuclear weapons.
He’s an article from November where the director talks about how a lot of their reports are misquoted and Iran was not attempting to develop nukes
That may be it. Could be from a different news outlet but covering the same information.Was this the story referenced? UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment
Of course it raises the terror threat level here in the US. That increased threat is a direct result of Joe Biden's wide open borders allowing terrorists to stream into the country for years completely unabated. That threat also existed whether or not we struck Iran. This strike just makes the threat more imminent."They don’t want anything getting out that says what they’re doing in Iran is raising the threat level at home."
Consider the source, but if true this obsession with optics seems dangerous
![]()
Trump blocks FBI terror threat alert linked to Iran war
Top Trump officials ordered it placed on hold over concerns that it could show the domestic risk of the war and further erode public support.www.dailymail.co.uk
The internet’s answer:
The main reasons given were:
1. The administration wanted to review the information first
A White House spokesperson said they were ensuring intelligence released publicly was accurate and properly vetted before distribution.
This is the official explanation.
2. Possible political or strategic concerns
Some officials involved in the process suggested another reason:
One DHS official said that concern may have led the administration to pause it.
- The report would have raised the official threat level inside the U.S.
- It might suggest that military actions against Iran were increasing domestic security risks.
3. Inter-agency disagreement
Reports say
So part of the issue may also have been procedural conflict between agencies
- DHS prepared the report
- The FBI objected to how it was handled
- The White House intervened after it was notified only hours before release.
My thought:
They blocked it because they do not feel it’s time to create mass hysteria in America. They don’t believe that there is a threat of an imminent Mass Terrorist Attack on US soil. Possibly blocking the release of the bulletin to not inspire these attacks from radical individuals.
I didn't call you a liar. I said your facts were wrong. And they were. Having the ability to admit when you're wrong is a good thing. I've been wrong a bazillion times. We all have been.I tried to have a conversation with you. Then you decided to call me a liar. Call me a liar and the gloves come off. And no, I'm not sure we're all on the same side. Many on here are hoping for failure. They wait for any bad news to have some sort of "gotcha " moment.
All my points were reasonable. Just because you believe it won't work out doesn't mean it won't. All I know at this point is the person responsible for killing as many as 40,000 innocent people are dead in pieces. Millions around the world that are much more in tune than you or I am are dancing in the streets while people in the US are eulogizing that ruthless killer.
Oil tops $90 per barrel. Did anyone really not see this coming? Are you really too simple to see a repeat of George W’s WMD’s and war in the Middle East decision?
Raise your hand and disagree with me. We need to make a list.
No worries I didn’t take it that wayUnderstood. I am not challenging your post. Just looking for clarity.
I am one of the weirdos who doesn't really care Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. As a sovereign nation they have that autonomy. Frankly, I think Israel has more to lose if Iran is nuclear compared to us.
The way I take it is yes Iran was enriching uranium passed the limit up to 60% just below weapons grade(both US intelligence and IAEA has maintained this assessment). After the bombings last summer the IAEA couldn’t provide proof if the enrichment actually stopped. They seemed to maintain that there was never any proof they had a nuclear weapons program in place though.That may be it. Could be from a different news outlet but covering the same information.
Looking at that pbs article, the IAEA doesn't seem so certain as it did in previous reports.
Is that your take away?
Your right, the Rinos and the Neocons are dead.As a registered Republican and a conservative I can say without a doubt that the Republican Party is dead.
Just like the Democrats left the moderates behind the Republicans are leaving the conservatives behind.
Republicans (trumpets) no longer care about:
1. The constitution
2. Fiscal responsibility
3. Small government
4. States rights
The dear leader of the Republican Party is a socialist.
Keep drinking the peace Presidents kool aid
Does he have a Palestinian flag in his office? Was he rich before he got elected or was he poor and got rich while making 170,000 while in office, and now pushes for the confiscation of the wealth of others? Did he ever marry his brother?Trump has pushed for several proposals put forward by Pocohontas, Bernie, and the Squad...
